Herald Leader Editorial: "On Guantanamo, It's Fear Vs. Faith".
On Guantanamo, it's fear vs. faith
Yesterday the American people heard an appeal to fear, and an appeal to faith in the principles of the Constitution.
An appeal to fear, and an appeal to faith in this country's competence to identify and protect itself from security risks.
The appeal to competence and the rule of law came from President Barack Obama.
The appeal to fear came from former Vice President Dick Cheney, who is on tour denouncing the president and defending the actions of one of the most incompetent administrations in history.
The former vice president took the stage of a right-wing think tank moments after the president finished speaking from the National Archives, where the Constitution, Bill of Rights and Declaration of Independence are enshrined.
The immediate dispute is over what to do with 240 detainees still imprisoned at Guantanamo Bay in Cuba.
The larger issue is how to retool our anti-terror strategy into something more effective than the Bush-Cheney plan that let Osama bin Laden escape and his allies expand their reach to within spitting distance of Pakistan's nukes, while turning thousands of innocent Afghans and Pakistanis into refugees and war victims.
One of the arguments cited by Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell and others against changes at Guantanamo are findings by the Pentagon that 74 of the 534 prisoners already released are engaged in terrorism or militant activity.
The decisions to release most of those detainees would have been based on the Bush regime's best intelligence, secret proceedings and prisons, and torture, er, enhanced interrogation techniques that Cheney says work wonders.
So, if the one in seven recidivism rate is correct and a cause for worry, that's a reason to change, not cling to past practices.
There's no doubt that Americans are scared, as well we should be, by the gains that al-Qaida has made in Afghanistan and Pakistan and the possibility of new attacks.
Rather than exploit those fears for questionable political ends, members of Congress should be addressing the challenges to security. None of those challenges, as Obama said, is more difficult than developing an acceptable process for adjudicating future detainees and those remaining at Guantanamo.
McConnell urged Obama to show flexibility and develop a plan that is acceptable to Congress.
McConnell should likewise join in the process described by Obama of developing a pragmatic plan that keeps this country safe while also respecting the principles that set this country apart.
Or does McConnell, a First Amendment hawk, consider other constitutional provisions, such as the one against locking away people with no due process, impractical in a dangerous world?
To reprise an old refrain, if the terrorists convince us that the Constitution is obsolete, they really have won.
Yesterday the American people heard an appeal to fear, and an appeal to faith in the principles of the Constitution.
An appeal to fear, and an appeal to faith in this country's competence to identify and protect itself from security risks.
The appeal to competence and the rule of law came from President Barack Obama.
The appeal to fear came from former Vice President Dick Cheney, who is on tour denouncing the president and defending the actions of one of the most incompetent administrations in history.
The former vice president took the stage of a right-wing think tank moments after the president finished speaking from the National Archives, where the Constitution, Bill of Rights and Declaration of Independence are enshrined.
The immediate dispute is over what to do with 240 detainees still imprisoned at Guantanamo Bay in Cuba.
The larger issue is how to retool our anti-terror strategy into something more effective than the Bush-Cheney plan that let Osama bin Laden escape and his allies expand their reach to within spitting distance of Pakistan's nukes, while turning thousands of innocent Afghans and Pakistanis into refugees and war victims.
One of the arguments cited by Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell and others against changes at Guantanamo are findings by the Pentagon that 74 of the 534 prisoners already released are engaged in terrorism or militant activity.
The decisions to release most of those detainees would have been based on the Bush regime's best intelligence, secret proceedings and prisons, and torture, er, enhanced interrogation techniques that Cheney says work wonders.
So, if the one in seven recidivism rate is correct and a cause for worry, that's a reason to change, not cling to past practices.
There's no doubt that Americans are scared, as well we should be, by the gains that al-Qaida has made in Afghanistan and Pakistan and the possibility of new attacks.
Rather than exploit those fears for questionable political ends, members of Congress should be addressing the challenges to security. None of those challenges, as Obama said, is more difficult than developing an acceptable process for adjudicating future detainees and those remaining at Guantanamo.
McConnell urged Obama to show flexibility and develop a plan that is acceptable to Congress.
McConnell should likewise join in the process described by Obama of developing a pragmatic plan that keeps this country safe while also respecting the principles that set this country apart.
Or does McConnell, a First Amendment hawk, consider other constitutional provisions, such as the one against locking away people with no due process, impractical in a dangerous world?
To reprise an old refrain, if the terrorists convince us that the Constitution is obsolete, they really have won.
Labels: News reporting
posted by KYJurisDoctor at 8:31 PM
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home