Google
 
Web Osi Speaks!

Thursday, January 18, 2007

Gambling and Kentucky's future.

It appears that this is another election where gambling will, once again, raise its beautiful or ugly -- depending on your stance here -- head. So far, gubernatorial candidates are making their positions known. Read it here. Gov. Fletcher has always said he is personally opposed to the expansion of gambling, but would not stand in the way if it were to become a ballot initiative. Anne Northup voted against establishing a lottery when she was a state representative, and has stated she would leave the issue up to lawmakers [and, presumably, voters]. Billy Harper is said to be morally opposed to the expansion of legalized gambling and believes it is unwise for the future of the state's economy to depend on it. So it appears all of the Republican gubernatorial candidates oppose expanded gambling -- unless the same is approved by the voters. A very wise move on their part, since voters need to decide the controversial issue that will so profoudly affect (and effect) their lives.
Steve Beshear, the Democratic candidate, started the debate when he stated that he wants voters to decide on (though it is clear he supports the idea of) legalizing expanded gambling at racetracks and casinos (but not slot machines at convenience stores, bars and restaurants), which he claims "will generate $500 million a year". It is not known where other prospectic candidates fit in on this issue, including Gatewood Galbraith, who is expected to announce his candidacy as a Democrat for Governor on Tuesday, January 23rd at noon in the Rotunda of the Kentucky Capitol.

Labels: , ,

5 Comments:

Anonymous Anonymous said...

Here is what I am wondering... what is the correct response to this issue? Who has the guts to state it?

6:47 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

The correct response is to be against expended gambling, but my guess is that at some point in the future, it will go the other way.

7:04 AM  
Blogger KYJurisDoctor said...

The rising political influence of the Casinocrats is what is driving most of this gambling issue. Read the article by clicking on "Casinocrats" above.

11:22 AM  
Blogger KentuckySteele said...

I agree with you on Casinocrats... Its a vogue issue given Indiana and Pennsylvania's foray into this... That said, it is a powerful lobbying influence and I am interested to see what would happen to a Republican candidate who took a stronger stance against it...

7:38 PM  
Blogger KYJurisDoctor said...

I doubt you will see that. I think the Republican candidates so far have taken noble stands on the issue by suggesting that the voters decide it. Afterall, that democratises gambling the way issues that profoundly affect people's lives should be decided.

10:03 AM  

Post a Comment

<< Home