Google
 
Web Osi Speaks!

Thursday, January 24, 2008

The New York Times endorses John McCain ... and Hillary Clinton.


Here's McCain's endorsement; here's Hillary Clinton's "Mrs. Clinton is more qualified, right now, to be president" endorsement..

As to why the newspaper is NOT backing the other Republican candidates, here's an excerpt from the endorsement:

The real Mr. Giuliani, whom many New Yorkers came to know and mistrust, is a narrow, obsessively secretive, vindictive man who saw no need to limit police power. Racial polarization was as much a legacy of his tenure as the rebirth of Times Square.

Mr. Giuliani’s arrogance and bad judgment are breathtaking. When he claims fiscal prudence, we remember how he ran through surpluses without a thought to the inevitable downturn and bequeathed huge deficits to his successor. He fired Police Commissioner William Bratton, the architect of the drop in crime, because he couldn’t share the limelight. He later gave the job to Bernard Kerik, who has now been indicted on fraud and corruption charges.

The Rudolph Giuliani of 2008 first shamelessly turned the horror of 9/11 into a lucrative business, with a secret client list, then exploited his city’s and the country’s nightmare to promote his presidential campaign.

The other candidates offer no better choices.

Mitt Romney’s shape-shifting rivals that of Mr. Giuliani. It is hard to find an issue on which he has not repositioned himself to the right since he was governor of Massachusetts. It is impossible to figure out where he stands or where he would lead the country.

Mike Huckabee, the former governor of Arkansas, is an affable, reassuring Baptist minister who talks about a softer Christian conservativism. His policies tell the real story. To attract Republican primary voters, he has become an anti-immigrant absolutist. His insertion of religion into the race, herding Mr. Romney into a defense of his beliefs, disqualified him for the Oval Office
.

I CANNOT say I disagree with the Times on the Republican field, and I CANNOT say I agree with them on their choice of Hillary.

Any thoughts?

Labels:

2 Comments:

Blogger Unknown said...

I would prefer the endorsement of MoveOn.org over the New York Times! Oops, I guess there is really no difference.

8:40 AM  
Blogger KYJurisDoctor said...

Very FUNNY! But you can't, in good conscience, quibble with their conclusions -- other than for "Slick Hill".

2:22 PM  

Post a Comment

<< Home