Wednesday, December 31, 2014
Tuesday, December 30, 2014
Monday, December 29, 2014
Saturday, December 27, 2014
Friday, December 26, 2014
Kareem Abdul-Jabbar: The Police Aren’t Under Attack. Institutionalized Racism Is.
Kareem Abdul-Jabbar: The Police Aren’t Under Attack. Institutionalized Racism Is.
The way to honor those who defend our liberties with their lives — as did my father and grandfather — is not to curtail liberty, but to exercise it fully in pursuit of a just and peaceful society
According to Ecclesiastes, “To every thing there is a season, and a time to every purpose.” For me, today, that means a time to seek justice and a time to mourn the dead.And a time to shut the hell up.
The recent brutal murder of two Brooklyn police officers, Rafael Ramos and Wenjian Liu, is a national tragedy that should inspire nationwide mourning. Both my grandfather and father were police officers, so I appreciate what a difficult and dangerous profession law enforcement is. We need to value and celebrate the many officers dedicated to protecting the public and nourishing our justice system. It’s a job most of us don’t have the courage to do.
At the same time, however, we need to understand that their deaths are in no way related to the massive protests against systemic abuses of the justice system as symbolized by the recent deaths—also national tragedies—of Eric Garner, Akai Gurley, and Michael Brown. Ismaaiyl Brinsley, the suicidal killer, wasn’t an impassioned activist expressing political frustration, he was a troubled man who had shot his girlfriend earlier that same day. He even Instagrammed warnings of his violent intentions. None of this is the behavior of a sane man or rational activist. The protests are no more to blame for his actions than The Catcher in the Rye was for the murder of John Lennon or the movie Taxi Driver for the attempted assassination of Ronald Reagan. Crazy has its own twisted logic and it is in no way related to the rational cause-and-effect world the rest of us attempt to create.
Those who are trying to connect the murders of the officers with the thousands of articulate and peaceful protestors across America are being deliberately misleading in a cynical and selfish effort to turn public sentiment against the protestors. This is the same strategy used when trying to lump in the violence and looting with the legitimate protestors, who have disavowed that behavior. They hope to misdirect public attention and emotion in order to stop the protests and the progressive changes that have already resulted. Shaming and blaming is a lot easier than addressing legitimate claims.
Some police unions are especially heinous perpetrators. New York City Mayor Bill de Blasio’s previous public support of protestors has created friction with these unions. The Patrolman’s Benevolent Association responded with a petition asking that the mayor not attend the funerals of officers killed in the line of duty. Following the murders of Ramos and Liu, an account appearing to represent the Sergeants Benevolent Association tweeted: “The blood of 2 executed police officers is on the hands of Mayor de Blasio.” Former New York governor George Pataki tweeted: “Sickened by these barbaric acts, which sadly are a predictable outcome of divisive anti-cop rhetoric of #ericholder and #mayordeblasio. #NYPD.”
This phony and logically baffling indignation is similar to that expressed by the St. Louis County Police Association when it demanded an apology from the NFL when several Rams players entered the field with their hands held high in the iconic Michael Brown gesture of surrender. Or when LeBron James and W.R. Allen wore his “I Can’t Breathe” shirts echoing Eric Garner’s final plea before dying. Such outrage by police unions and politicians implies that there is no problem, which is the erroneous perception that the protestors are trying to change.
This shrill cry of “policism” (a form of reverse racism) by Pataki and the police unions is a hollow and false whine born of financial self-interest (unions) or party politics (Republican Pataki besmirching Democrat de Blasio) rather than social justice. These tragic murders now become a bargaining chip in whatever contract negotiations or political aspirations they have.
What prompted a mentally unstable man to shoot two officers? Protestors? The mayor? Or the unjust killings of unarmed black men? Probably none of them. He was a ticking bomb that anything might have set off. What’s most likely to prevent future incidents like this? Stopping the protests which had sparked real and positive changes through a national dialogue? Changes that can only increase faith in and respect for the police? No, because the killer was mentally unfit. Most likely protecting the police from future incidents will come from better mental health care to identify, treat, and monitor violent persons. Where are those impassioned tweets demanding that?
In a Dec. 21, 2014 article about the shooting, the Los Angeles Times referred to the New York City protests as “anti-police marches,” which is grossly inaccurate and illustrates the problem of perception the protestors are battling. The marches are meant to raise awareness of double standards, lack of adequate police candidate screening, and insufficient training that have resulted in unnecessary killings. Police are not under attack, institutionalized racism is. Trying to remove sexually abusive priests is not an attack on Catholicism, nor is removing ineffective teachers an attack on education. Bad apples, bad training, and bad officials who blindly protect them, are the enemy.
And any institution worth saving should want to eliminate them, too.
“To every thing there is a season, and a time to every purpose.” This is the season and time when we should be resolved to continue seeking justice together and not let those with blind biases distract, diminish, or divide us. The way to honor those who defend our liberties with their lives—as did my father and grandfather—is not to curtail liberty, but to exercise it fully in pursuit of a just and peaceful society.
Wednesday, December 24, 2014
Tuesday, December 23, 2014
Monday, December 22, 2014
Sunday, December 21, 2014
Saturday, December 20, 2014
Friday, December 19, 2014
Thursday, December 18, 2014
Wednesday, December 17, 2014
Tuesday, December 16, 2014
Monday, December 15, 2014
Saturday, December 13, 2014
Friday, December 12, 2014
Thursday, December 11, 2014
Wednesday, December 10, 2014
Tuesday, December 09, 2014
Monday, December 08, 2014
Saturday, December 06, 2014
Friday, December 05, 2014
More On #Ferguson: More Cameras On #Roguecops? But Even Video Evidence Did Not Help Police Chokehold Victim!
Thursday, December 04, 2014
Wednesday, December 03, 2014
Tuesday, December 02, 2014
A national tragedy
by Clarence Page
When my fellow critics of Ferguson, Mo., police are reduced to arguing not whether but how hard Michael Brown hit police officer Darren Wilson, I think it is time to rethink what this scandal is all about or, more pointedly, what it should be about.
I was not surprised that a grand jury did not indict police officer Darren Wilson in the killing of 18-year-old Michael Brown, but I was disappointed in the way that St. Louis County prosecutor Robert McCulloch announced it. He sounded like he was using the grand jury to provide cover for a controversial decision that he already had made.
A grand jury normally is supposed to review a prosecutor’s evidence to see if the case is worth taking to court, where witnesses and evidence can be cross-examined and both sides can be argued. Instead, McCulloch presented both sides, raised doubts about contradictory eyewitnesses and gave Wilson four hours of unchallenged testimony that amounted to a case against the deceased.
Judging by credible witnesses and a video of his earlier robbery of cigars from a convenience store, Brown was no angel. But neither was the prosecutor in circumventing the full, open and fair trial that Brown’s family, among multitudes of others, wanted to have.
To outsiders, Brown’s symbolic value quickly outgrew his reality, partly because of the excessively secretive way the killing was handled by Ferguson’s police department.
To the left, Brown became a martyr in the fight against institutional racism. To the right, he became a symbol of every grievance conservatives have against liberals and President Barack Obama. To many libertarians, he became a symbol of heavy-handed police practices and distrust of state power. You name it, Brown became a symbol for it.
It is not unfair to say that Brown could still be alive today if he had not responded to Wilson’s questions with punches to Wilson’s face and attempts to grab his gun, according to witnesses.
But in a case already boiling in a pot of national suspicions, McCulloch could have avoided adding fuel to the fire by letting the grand jury decide whether to take the case to trial before essentially trying it in the grand jury.
I also am disappointed that Brown’s symbolic value distracted so many Americans from other, more clear-cut cases of bad policing since Brown’s death that help explain why polls show black Americans to be far more distrustful of police than whites.
Thanks to a dash-cam video recording, we can see why Lance Cpl. Sean Groubert, a South Carolina state trooper, was arrested and charged for shooting Levar Edward Jones, 35, an unarmed black man during a traffic stop for a seatbelt violation in early September.
Jones was shot in the hip by one of four rounds Groubert fired when Jones reached back into his car to retrieve his license – a little too quickly, Groubert said afterward, as he was putting a pained and puzzled Jones into handcuffs.
Fortunately he survived. He was luckier than 12-year-old Tamir Rice. The black youth can be seen in a surveillance video playing with his BB gun in a Cleveland, Ohio, park when a cruiser pulls up and a white police officer Timothy Loehmann, responding to a 911 call, jumps out and within seconds shoots the boy dead. Loehmann and Officer Frank Garmback, who drove the patrol car, were placed on administrative leave.
Why don’t media and activists care as much about black police who shoot white suspects? That question has been raised, particularly by conservative news and social media, after the killing of Dillon Taylor, an unarmed 20-year-old white man outside a convenient store in Salt Lake City. Officer Bron Cruz, identified only as “nonwhite,” has been cleared of possible wrongdoing after an investigation.
The officer’s body camera recorded the entire incident, Police Chief Chris Burbank told reporters, once again demonstrating the value of putting such cameras on all police. I hope Utah officials will release as much information as possible, as quickly as possible. That would avoid the sort of mistakes by Ferguson officials that only raised suspicions and turned a local tragedy into a national crisis.