Google
 
Web Osi Speaks!

Wednesday, November 05, 2014

U. S. Senator, My Buddy, Mitch McConnell, Coasts To Victory Against Alison Lundergan Grimes, And Is Now Senate Majority Leader. Congrats., Mitch.

Tuesday, October 14, 2014

In Case You Missed The "Debate" Between Mitch McConnell And Alison Lundergan Grimes, Click This Link To Watch It. Enjoy.

Monday, September 01, 2014

Mitch McConnell Etends Lead Over Alison Lundergan Grimes. As I Have Consistently Forecast: Mitch McConnell Is Poised To Be Senate Majority Leader.


Bluegrass Poll: Gaining momentum, McConnell holds 4-point advantage over Grimes

The re-election campaign of U.S. Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell has gained momentum in the last month, propelled by huge leads over Democrat Alison Lundergan Grimes in Western and Eastern Kentucky and among men, according to a new Bluegrass Poll.

With less than 10 weeks until Election Day, the poll of 569 likely voters shows McConnell with a 4-point lead over Grimes, up from a 2 point margin a month ago. McConnell now leads Grimes 46 percent to 42 percent, with Libertarian candidate David Patterson at 5 percent.

(Read the Full poll results).

McConnell's showing is his best to date in the Bluegrass Poll, but the race remains well within the poll's margin of error of plus or minus 4.2 percentage points. In addition, 8 percent of respondents remain undecided, and the number of people with a negative view of the senator remains high.

The poll, sponsored by the Herald-Leader and WKYT-TV in Lexington and the Courier-Journal and WHAS-TV in Louisville, was conducted by SurveyUSA on landline telephones and cell phones from Aug. 25-27.

The survey was conducted before McConnell's campaign manager, Jesse Benton, resigned abruptly Friday evening as a growing scandal related to Benton's time as political director for former U.S. Rep. Ron Paul's 2012 presidential campaign threatened to envelop McConnell. Much of the poll also was conducted before a liberal-leaning publication published a secret recording Tuesday night of McConnell vowing to block votes on raising the minimum wage and other issues as he spoke privately with major Republican donors.

McConnell's popularity remains underwater statewide, with 36 percent of respondents holding a favorable view of him, compared to 46 percent unfavorable.

But his popularity spikes in the western and eastern parts of the state, where he has conducted bus tours in recent weeks to blame President Barack Obama for steep job losses in the coal industry.

In Western Kentucky, his favorable rating is 52 percent, compared to 33 percent unfavorable. In Eastern Kentucky, he is viewed favorably by 42 percent of respondents and unfavorably by 39 percent.

As such, McConnell's biggest leads over Grimes come from those regions. McConnell leads 55 percent to 32 percent in the west and 59 percent to 32 percent in the east.

Terrell Skinner of Russellville, a poll respondent who agreed to a follow-up interview with the Herald-Leader, said he is backing McConnell because of the senator's opposition to President Barack Obama's administration.

"He's the number one thorn in the Democrats' side in Washington, and that's a good thing," Skinner said.

Meanwhile, the percentage of voters who have an opinion about Grimes continues to grow, but their views are split: 38 percent favorable and 37 percent unfavorable.

Grimes leads 45 percent to 38 percent in the Louisville area, and she holds a 49 percent to 40 percent lead in north-central Kentucky, which includes Lexington. In the west and east, however, more voters appear to be accepting McConnell's accusations that she will be a rubber stamp for Obama.

In Western Kentucky, her favorable rating dips to 32 percent, compared to 40 percent unfavorable. Voters are split evenly at 37 percent in Eastern Kentucky.

Poll respondent Jerri McClure of Jamestown is among those who see Grimes in a positive light, accepting her argument that McConnell, who is seeking his sixth term, has been in Washington too long.

"I'm tired of the old boys bureaucracy," McClure said. "Communities like Jamestown, it's just stagnated. It needs to have some fresh blood, and we need to get motivated for a new time. It's time for senators to stop lining their pockets."

Despite Grimes' efforts to target female voters, McConnell continues to poll equally well with them — 45 percent chose Grimes, and 44 percent chose McConnell.

Among men, Grimes faces a 10-point deficit: 48 percent to 38 percent.

Grimes also is losing a quarter of support from her own party, with 25 percent of Democrats saying they will vote for McConnell.

The senator, who squared off against Louisville businessman Matt Bevin in a contentious May primary, continues to see Republicans returning to the fold, locking up 79 percent of Republican respondents. That's up from 72 percent in last month's Bluegrass Poll.

By comparison, Grimes was the choice of only 67 percent of Democrats.

Taken on the whole, the poll suggests McConnell has successfully capitalized on Kentucky's disdain for Obama, who has a 29 percent favorable and 57 percent unfavorable rating. Talk of Obama and his administration's coal policies dominated the spring and summer phases of the race.

When asked which candidate would "most effectively fight for Kentucky's coal interests," respondents gave McConnell a 2-to-1 advantage over Grimes, 44 percent to 22 percent. In the coal-producing parts of the state, those margins are even wider, with 51 percent of respondents in the west and east giving the nod to McConnell.

About one in four registered voters said they believe "there is no war on coal." But in Eastern Kentucky, where more than 7,000 coal jobs have been lost in recent years, only 12 percent of respondents said there is no war on coal.

Stephen Voss, a professor of political science at the University of Kentucky, said the poll reflects voters returning to the way they have voted in the past, and that "the events of the last month have reminded them of why they're usually on one side or the other, and they're snapping back to their usual preferences."

"Conservative voters are returning to the fold, increasingly expressing an intention to support McConnell, and while Grimes pulls in comparable support among the small number of liberals, she has not convinced moderates to break her way in the lopsided fashion needed to counterbalance a large Republican base," Voss said.

As Grimes attempts to erase McConnell's edge, she has employed the right surrogate. Former President Bill Clinton, who joined Grimes for rallies in Lexington and Hazard this month, is viewed favorably by 53 percent and unfavorably by 23 percent.

But on a host of issues polled, McConnell has the upper hand over Grimes.

On the question of who voters trust more on issues of foreign policy, McConnell leads Grimes 43 percent to 28 percent. On immigration, McConnell leads 40 percent to 32 percent.

And on the economy, which voters in the last Bluegrass Poll said was their top issue by a landslide, McConnell leads Grimes 40 percent to 38 percent, again with massive margins in the eastern and western parts of the state.

Despite watching an 11-point lead among women evaporate since February, Grimes holds an enormous edge over McConnell on the question of who voters trust more to improve the lives of women. Only 31 percent of respondents answered McConnell, compared to 51 percent for Grimes.

Overall, Voss said, the unfolding campaign is largely having the effect of "reminding conservatives why they prefer a Republican and liberals why they prefer a Democrat." That has allowed McConnell to maintain or improve his position despite his popularity ratings getting no better.

"If anything, more people see him in an unfavorable light than they did a month ago," Voss said. "But with the contentious Republican primary fading in the rear-view mirror, the conservatives who used to help drive those bad numbers are now getting on board with McConnell, while liberal voters dislike him even more than before."

Poll respondent Marilyn Miller of Louisville said she is unhappy with Washington and long-serving public officials but still supports McConnell.

"He's the lesser of two evils," Miller said of McConnell.


Read more here: http://www.kentucky.com/2014/08/30/3404367_bluegrass-poll-gaining-momentum.html?sp=/99/322/&rh=1#storylink=cpy

Labels: , , , , ,

Friday, December 13, 2013

Why I Plan To Vote For Mitch McConnell Come May.



I know the Kentucky Republican primary elections is not until May, but I have not been convinced not to cast my vote for Mitch McConnell for Senate!

Yes, I am for term limits but the term MUST first appear in our U. A. Constitution in order that I may be assured all the other states of the Union will abide by it also!!

#Kentucky#USSenate#MitchMcConnell

Labels: , ,

Monday, November 11, 2013

My Friend, Rand Paul, Challenges His Critics To A Duel, And Now Allison Lundergan Grimes Challenges My Buddy Mitch McConnell To A Shooting Contest After He Receives NRA Award! Let The Shooting Commence!!

Senate candidates tout gun-rights support






Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell bagged an award Friday from the powerful National Rifle Association, while his chief Democratic rival in next year's Senate race defended her support of gun rights and threw down a marksmanship challenge to the Republican senator.
"Whenever he's not busy pandering to Washington lobbyists, I welcome Sen. McConnell to come shoot with me at the range any day," said Democratic candidate Alison Lundergan Grimes, an NRA member and skeet shooter.

Grimes' campaign released a photo Friday showing her shooting at her family's farm in northern Kentucky.
McConnell didn't respond to a reporter's question Friday asking if he'd be willing to test his shooting skills against Grimes' at a gun range.
The Grimes campaign pounced, saying McConnell "loves to talk a big game," but "when asked to back it up, he fails badly and walks away."
The senator was at a Bullitt County gun club to pick up the NRA's "Defender of Freedom" award and to recognize a sportsmen's coalition backing him.
McConnell was flanked by shotguns lined up next to flags, and boxes of clay targets were stacked by the podium. Empty shotgun shells littered the ground nearby.
Gun-rights issues are hot-button topics in Kentucky, where about 300,000 hunters are set to trudge through the woods in coming days in pursuit of deer.
Louisville businessman Matt Bevin, who is challenging McConnell in the GOP primary next spring, touted his own credentials. Bevin noted he and his wife have licenses to carry concealed weapons, and said he'd be a strong defender of constitutional rights. Bevin has been endorsed by the group Gun Owners of America.
McConnell, who is seeking his sixth term next year, aimed his criticism at President Barack Obama, who is unpopular in Kentucky, and gun control advocates.
McConnell said efforts to pass stricter gun laws in the wake of mass shootings were an example of the "nanny state" advocated by Democrats.
"After every dreadful, awful occurrence of some person with deep mental disability, their reaction to that is try to restrict your rights given to you under the Second Amendment to the Constitution," he told a group of supporters. "And there's very little talk about how to deal with the problem of mentally incapacitated people."
McConnell, the Senate's top Republican, said he's the prime target for national Democrats in next year's elections. He noted the blistering attacks already unleashed against him, then added: "I assure you, I'm not going to turn the other cheek." McConnell is known for his own bare-knuckled campaign style.
Mark Nethery, president of the League of Kentucky Sportsmen, said McConnell has an "impeccable record" of protecting Second Amendment rights.
The NRA said McConnell "stood with gun owners and hunters through the toughest of times."
McConnell was recognized by the NRA for a series of Senate votes, including his fight against bans on semi-automatic weapons and high-capacity ammunition magazines. He also won NRA praise for helping block legislation that would have expanded background checks to include sales at commercial venues like gun shows and on the Internet.
Grimes, the state's secretary of state, said in a statement that her support for gun rights is "unquestioned."
"In the Senate, I will protect my fellow Kentuckians' right to keep and bear arms," she said.

Labels: , , , ,

Tuesday, July 23, 2013

TEA Partier Matt Blevin Of Louisville Aims To Take On Mitch McConnell In Battle For GOP Primary Nod For Senate.

Tea party activist to take on Sen. Mitch McConnell

— Louisville businessman Matt Bevin, the tea party activist who had signaled that he intends to run against Senate Republican Leader Mitch McConnell, removed all doubt Tuesday with a press advisory listing stops on a statewide tour to announce his candidacy.
Bevin's challenge reflects a splintering of the tea party in Kentucky where several leading activists, including Sen. Rand Paul, have already pledged their support to McConnell in an effort to keep others in the GOP's most conservative wing from peeling off.

Some tea party critics fault McConnell for voting for financial bailouts, debt ceiling increases and deficit spending during his nearly three decades in office. However, many conservatives are willing to overlook those points, seeing him as a valuable asset against the Obama administration. It's a rift that has played out elsewhere in the U.S.: Tea party supporters demanding strict conservatism pitted against more moderate, establishment politicians with a track record of getting things done.
"Mitch McConnell is a proven conservative who stands strong for Kentucky in the face of President Obama's big government agenda in Washington," Paul said in a statement to The Associated Press. "He is a consistent voice against Obamacare and against this administration's war on coal. He has stood up for Kentucky values."

McConnell helped Paul win the general election in 2010 by providing assistance with fundraising and campaign strategy. Now Paul is trying to help McConnell by touting him as a friend to the tea party and its conservative principles. Pragmatists within the movement don't want to jeopardize a friendly GOP seat in the face of a strong Democratic challenger. More zealous tea party activists are bent on taking on McConnell, and are talking smack ahead of Bevin's official announcement on Wednesday.
Republican state Rep. Mike Harmon, who ran as a tea party candidate for lieutenant governor in 2011, said Kentucky needs McConnell's clout in Washington. He said most tea party Republicans, himself included, don't want to run the risk of damaging McConnell in the primary and weakening him in the general election against Democratic challenger Alison Lundergan Grimes, Kentucky's 34-year-old secretary of state.

Knocking off McConnell would be the Democrats' biggest prize of the 2014 election. His seat is one of 14 that Republicans are defending, while Democrats try to hold onto 21.
One of Kentucky's most outspoken tea party activists, David Adams of Nicholasville, said McConnell has grown out of touch and said if he doesn't take Bevin seriously, "we should all drop moving boxes off at his state offices because he will lose." Adams then called on McConnell to retire and get behind Bevin "while he can still leave the Senate with dignity."

Louisville Metro Councilwoman Marilyn Parker, another tea party activist, said voters "need to consider the big picture" in the Senate race.
"Sen. McConnell has the influence and institutional knowledge to mitigate the over-reaching power of Obama's IRS, Obama's EPA, and Obama's health care act that is putting private health insurance, hospitals, doctors, nurses, patients, small business owners, and jobs at risk," she said. "Time is of the essence and a freshman senator will not have the clout to lead Kentucky and the country to sustainable, healthy, and reasonable policy."

Louisville attorney Mike Karem, a Republican activist who worked for the Nixon and Reagan
administrations, said it's too early to know how the Bevin challenge will affect the Kentucky tea party that solidly united behind Paul in 2010. Karem said the challenge could damage the tea party.
"There's no question that will put a crack in the egg," he said. "The question is will the egg bust. This could be Humpty Dumpty, and all the king's horses and all the king's men may not be able to put it back together again."

Besides his alliance with Paul, McConnell has picked up support from other national tea party leaders and brought in a campaign manager, Texan Jesse Benton, from the upper echelons of the tea party movement. The moves have virtually ensured that no would-be challenger can get the kind of infusion of cash from tea party channels that allowed Paul to win here in 2010.
Benton said McConnell's tea party coalition remains strong, though he said "we don't want anyone who truly believes in freedom and limited government to 'splinter.'"

Labels: , , , ,

Monday, April 15, 2013

Mitch McConnell Raises Tons Of Money For Re-election.

McConnell fundraising nears $13M for re-election

U.S. Sen. Mitch McConnell has banked nearly $13 million for his re-election campaign, including more than $1.8 million since January, according to a financial report filed with the Federal Election Commission on Monday.
 
The FEC filing also shows he still has more than $8.6 million on hand.

"Mitch's popularity and deep, longstanding support make him the most prolific fundraiser in the game," said campaign manager Jesse Benton. "We are building the best statewide campaign America has ever seen, and will work hard to make Kentucky proud."
The latest report shows McConnell with an enormous head start over any potential rivals, although no serious challengers have stepped forward so far.

Actress Ashley Judd had considered running, but announced late last month that she won't. Kentucky Secretary of State Alison Lundergan Grimes, a rising star within the state Democratic Party, has said she is now considering getting into the race. But she hasn't indicated a deadline for making a decision.

Democratic Gov. Steve Beshear said Monday he continues to get encouragement from supporters to run against McConnell. But Beshear, in his second and final term as governor, told reporters he won't seek election to any other office.
Instead, Beshear said he is encouraging others to take a serious look at the race because he believes Kentuckians are ready to make a change if Democrats can provide "an appropriate alternative."
"I sincerely believe that Sen. McConnell is very vulnerable," Beshear said. "I think that people in Kentucky and, honestly, people throughout America are sick and tired of most of the folks in Washington right now because it's turned into a place where nothing gets done and where everybody simply yells at each other and raises money to stay in office and feather their own nests."

Defeating McConnell would be the Democrats' biggest prize of the 2014 election. His seat is one of 14 that Republicans are defending while Democrats try to hold onto 21, hoping to retain or add to their 55-45 edge.

McConnell, who has served in the Senate since 1984, has never lost an election. He spent more than $20 million in 2008 to beat Louisville businessman Bruce Lunsford by 6 percentage points.
Although the next round of Senate elections isn't until next year, McConnell's race has already heated up in Kentucky. Several Democratic groups have been running TV ads attacking McConnell. And McConnell has begun running TV, radio and Internet ads of his own.

Political ads aren't the only developments keeping the race in the public eye. The FBI, assisted by the U.S. Capitol Police, has begun a probe into the secret taping of a private campaign strategy meeting involving McConnell and several of his aides.
Progress Kentucky, a liberal political fundraising group, has been tied to the recording that was leaked to Mother Jones magazine and published last week. Mother Jones said the recording came from a confidential source. It posted audio and a transcript of the meeting online.

Labels: ,

Monday, January 07, 2013

Mitch McConnell: "Perfect? No, But Deal Had To Be Done". I TOTALLY AGREE!

McConnell: Perfect? No, but deal had to be done
Most in Kentucky are spared Tax hikes; on to spending cuts
By Mitch McConnell

Now that the calendar has flipped to 2013 and the so-called fiscal cliff crisis in Washington has been averted, people are asking if the agreement I helped negotiate last week was a perfect solution.

I'll be the first to say it isn't.

If it were up to me, no American would face tax increases, especially as our economy is still struggling. But there was no way around the fact that without some kind of agreement, taxes were set to rise dramatically on every single Kentuckian. I had to act to prevent that from happening.

As the clock ran out on 2012, President Barack Obama's strategy became clear. By doing nothing, Democrats in Washington would get everything they wanted. All of the Bush tax cuts would expire, raising tax rates on every person who pays income taxes. Severe across-the-board defense cuts would take effect. And Obama would have trillions more of your tax dollars to spend.

It was a liberal's dream — but a taxpayer's nightmare.

Some counseled that we should simply let the president have his way. He's the one who has recklessly added trillions to the debt and done nothing to reform out-of-control entitlement programs that, if left unreformed, will drive the country into fiscal ruin. A majority of voters just rewarded that agenda by re-electing him to a second term. Why not just let them see what the effect of those policies really is?

Although it would've been the easiest decision politically, I believe that would be completely at odds with my duty to the people of Kentucky.

I knew that out of 4.4 million people who call Kentucky home, only about 5,800 tax filers had an income above $500,000. I hated the fact that taxes would rise no matter what I did, but I thought that if I could convince this White House to abandon some of its planned tax hikes and lock in the current middle-class rates permanently, I could ensure that 99.7 percent of Kentuckians were spared an income tax increase.

It wasn't pretty, but it worked.

By the time the deal was sealed and the Senate convened to vote, the massive tax increase I raced to avoid had already hit the books. Thankfully, the Senate approved the agreement 89 to 8, and we acted to repeal the new taxes before they hit Kentucky paychecks.

If I had thrown up my hands and blamed the entire mess on a liberal president who cannot be reasoned with, the average family of four in Kentucky would be paying $2,000 more next year in taxes. Some would have praised my unwillingness to bend but it would have done nothing to stop families from having less in their pocket as a result. For me, that's an easy choice.

Was it a great deal? No. As I said, taxes shouldn't be going up on anyone, and if I had had my way they wouldn't. Just as importantly, the transcendent issue of our time, the spiraling national debt, remains completely unaddressed. But was it worth it?

For Kentucky, there is no question in my mind that it was. Nearly everyone in the state was spared from the president's do-nothing strategy, and now that he's finally gotten his long-sought tax hike on the "rich," we can turn squarely toward the real problem, which is spending.

Predictably, the president is already claiming that his tax hike isn't enough.

I have news for him: The moment he and virtually every elected Democrat in Washington signed off on the current agreement, that was the last word on taxes. That debate is over. Now the conversation turns to cutting spending on the government programs that are the real source of the nation's fiscal imbalance. And the upcoming debate on the debt limit is the perfect opportunity to have that discussion.

It's time to end the bickering in Washington and have a serious, substantive discussion about our most pressing issue: the long-term debt in this country, and how the only way we will ever get it under control is through serious entitlement reform. It will take leadership from both parties to enact meaningful reform and change the direction of our country.

The American people desperately want us to have this debate. It's a debate Republicans are ready to have. I look forward to beginning that debate today, before it's too late, with the president.

Read more here: http://www.kentucky.com/2013/01/06/2466166/mcconnell-perfect-no-but-deal.html#storylink=cpy

Labels: ,

Thursday, February 05, 2009

Mitch McConnell: The Path Forward [For The Republican Party].

The Path Forward
By Mitch McConnell

Republican National Committee Winter Meeting, January 29, 2009

"Thanks, Gail. And thank you Mike, for your leadership over the past two years.

"I wouldn't even think of turning down an invitation from Mike. It's the only chance I get all year to refer to a Republican in Washington as 'Mr. Chairman'.

"Kentucky seems to be pretty well represented here today, so I hope you don't mind if I begin with a little Kentucky trivia. A couple weeks ago, I surpassed a good man and a Democrat named Wendell Ford to become the longest-serving U.S. senator in Kentucky history. I remember what I was thinking on my first day in the Senate: I looked out at all the desks in front of me, and I thought none of these guys was ever going to lose, retire, or die. Of course, I was wrong. And all these years later, I'm honored to lead a very different group of Republicans in a very different time.

"This afternoon I'd like to share some of my thoughts about the state of our party and its future.

"The year Kentuckians first sent me to Washington, the Republican governor of New Jersey was reelected with 70% of the vote. Republicans had just taken over both legislative chambers in Connecticut, and the Republican candidate for president won 49 of 50 states. That same year you could walk from Maine to California and from Oregon to Florida, without leaving a state that had a Republican in the Senate. You would have found Republican governors on the East Coast, the West Coast, the Great Plains, and above and below the Mason Dixon Line. We were everywhere.

"A lot has changed since then. We had success in the 1990s, when voters soured on Bill Clinton and his vision of big government. And we had success after the 9/11 attacks, because we shared the belief of most Americans that war had been declared upon America and its allies -- and that it was long past time to confront Islamist terrorism.

"Yet today, when we look out at the political landscape, we see an array of worrisome signs:

"Every House member from New England is a Democrat. You can walk from Canada to Mexico and from Maine to Arizona without ever leaving a state with a Democratic governor. Not a single Republican senator represents the tens of millions of Americans on the West Coast. And on the East Coast, you can drive from North Carolina to New Hampshire without touching a single state in between that has a Republican in the U.S. Senate.

"Some of this is the result of changes in voter attitudes and demographics. We all hear a lot about how these things have affected our party in particular. We're all concerned about the fact that the very wealthy and the very poor, the most and least educated, and a majority of minority voters, seem to have more or less stopped paying attention to us. And we should be concerned that, as a result of all this, the Republican Party seems to be slipping into a position of being more of a regional party than a national one.

"In politics, there's a name for a regional party: it's called a minority party. And I didn't sign up to be a member of a regional party. I know no one in this room did either. As Republicans, we know that commonsense conservative principles aren't regional. But I think we have to admit that our sales job has been. And in my view, that needs to change.

"So we need to recognize where we are. Over the past two elections, we've lost 13 Senate seats and 51 House seats. Our most reliable voters are in decline as a percentage of the overall vote. And Democratic voter registration is on the rise.

"Now, we can argue about how much of this is attributable to our last president. On issue after issue, President Bush showed himself to be a man of principle. And I agreed with him most of the time. But we can all agree, sad as it is, that he wasn't winning any popularity contests. And history shows that unpopular presidents are usually a drag on everybody else who wears their political label. It happened with Truman. It happened with Johnson. It happened with Nixon. It happened with Clinton in '94. And it happened in '06 and '08 with President Bush.

"Still, the results of the two recent elections are real, and so are the obstacles we face as a party. And my concern is that unless we do something to adapt, our status as a minority party may become too pronounced for an easy recovery. The situation is challenging, but it's far from irreversible. We have a proud tradition of adapting to new circumstances. And if we're serious about a comeback -- and we must be -- then we'll all do what's necessary to get there.

"The first task, in my view, is to find the voters who've left the party. As we do this, the temptation for some will be to run from our principles or to dilute our message. I think that's a temptation we need to resist. These people were Republican for a reason. You don't get them back by pretending to be something else. And you certainly don't gain voters by running away from the ones that are most loyal. But it's clear our message isn't getting out to nearly as many people as it should. We need to give voters who've turned away a reason to take another look. And that takes a lot of work.

"We also need to expand the spectrum of people who vote Republican. We've made the case to African American voters that our policies are best suited to the dreams and aspirations of this community. Sadly, the party that was created on the principle that African Americans are equal members of society attracted just 4% of their vote this past fall. This doesn't mean we should abandon the effort. It means we should try twice as hard.

"We've tried reaching Hispanic voters. In 11 years, Hispanics will constitute one fifth of all voters. The future of campaigns and elections depends, for both parties, on the ability to attract voters from the Hispanic community. This is particularly true for us, since Hispanic growth is even more dramatic in regions where we do best. To borrow a corporate analogy, Hispanics are our customers, and turning them away would be like a businessman turning away his own customers. Hispanics are the fastest growing community in the country. About the same number of U.S. households tuned into Univision's Election Eve coverage as watch the "Today Show" in an average week. And Univision is the top ranked network on Friday nights for young viewers across the U.S.

"All of this should be good news for Republicans: in a center-right nation, polling suggests that Hispanic voters are even more conservative on a number of issues than the average American. About half say that tax cuts are the best route to economic growth. Nearly 80% oppose abortion. As Reagan put it, 'Hispanic voters are Republicans. They just don't know it yet.' Yet this past election saw the worst showing for our party among minorities in 150 years -- and not because Senator McCain didn't try. He did, mightily. We've worked hard to attract everyone who dreams of a better life -- in cities and suburbs and everywhere in between. We need to work even harder.

"One way to appeal to more voters is to realize that we can't promote what we don't know. So I think we need to have a better grasp of our history -- and a willingness to share it. The reason for the establishment of the Republican Party is not in dispute: A brave group of antislavery activists pledged that if Congress ever allowed slavery in the new territories of Kansas and Nebraska, they'd form a new party. When the Kansas-Nebraska Act became law, that's what they did. So the first thing to know about our party is that it was born of a commitment to equality and opportunity.

"In its early years, the Republican Party was responsible for The Homestead Act, which paved the way for the cultivation of the Midwest. Republicans were responsible for the Transcontinental Railroad, which bridged the Atlantic and Pacific, and set the foundation for the development of the western United States. We saw the need for an educated citizenry. We acted on it legislatively. And today, about one fifth of all college students in the U.S. are enrolled in schools that were created through the Land Grant Act of 1862.

"Later on, Republicans came to be known for fiscal restraint and low taxes, conservation, defending the working man, and laws that protected Americans from unsafe food and drugs. Republican influence waned in the 1930s and 1940s. But Republican accomplishments during the FDR years say a lot about our party. And the GI Bill is a good example. Here was a piece of legislation that didn't open the doors of opportunity to the well-born, but to the children of line-workers, mechanics, truck drivers and cabbies, from Biloxi to Brooklyn. It covered everyone who served -- including women and African Americans. And it was written by a Republican.

"Every one of these things came about because the Republican Party recognized new needs or new opportunities -- and responded to those needs with courage and vision and optimism. From Lincoln's day to our own day, as America has changed, Republicans have adapted with it.

"That's our past. Now what about our present? Today, as in the past, Republicans have the right solutions for the problems Americans expect government to address. Yet too often we've failed to express our ideas on issues that matter to people most. So we need to explain our ideas -- and the practical benefits they promise for people of every class or race in every corner of the country.

"Too often we've let others define us. And the image they've painted isn't very pretty. Ask most people what Republicans think about immigrants, and they'll say we fear them. Ask most people what we think about the environment, and they'll say we don't care about it. Ask most people what we think about the family, and they'll tell you we don't -- until about a month before Election Day.

"Republicans need to explain that when it comes to government spending, it should be limited. And the taxpayer's burden is our first concern, and that we support programs that create the conditions for individuals and families to flourish. On education, we need to explain that inner-city parents have the same rights to a good education for their kids that suburban parents do -- and show them that Republicans will fight this battle until it's won.

"Workers need to know that we're not anti-union -- we're pro employee. That means that when it comes to union elections, Republicans will protect a worker's right to a secret ballot. On healthcare, we need to explain to people that the best health care in the world is worthless if people can't afford it -- and that Republican policies will drive down costs.

"On energy independence, Republicans need to explain that our approach is the balanced one. If our twin goals are to keep prices low and reduce our dependence on foreign sources of oil, then we need to produce more, conserve more, and invest in the alternative and renewable fuels of the future. The Republican concept of finding more and using less is simple and sensible. People need to know about it. And on the environment, Republicans need to explain that the most effective way to protect the environment is to match our desire to protect it with our desire for prosperity.

"There isn't a single person in this room who doesn't support clean energy and clean air. There isn't a single person in this room who doesn't want more affordable health care. There isn't a single person in this room who doesn't want all of America's children to have the best education possible.

"We need to ask ourselves why most people don't think that we believe these things.

"There is no doubt that some in the media help the other side. President Obama got more credit for saying he wants to close Guantanamo than President Bush did for capturing the guys who live there. But blaming the media isn't a strategy for success. It's like blaming the ref for losing. The only sure way to win is to explain our ideas to those who stand to benefit from them. In the end, these are the people who decide elections. Americans are increasingly mobile. The family dollar doesn't stretch as far as it used to. College tuition has become impossible for many to pay. To all these 21st Century realities, Democrats offer 20th Century solutions. And we need to highlight it.

"In Congress, we'll be responsible enough to admit when the other side is right. But we'll also point out where Democrat ideas fall short. We'll point it out when Democrats attempt to undermine or reverse successful terror-fighting policies that have kept us safe since 9/11.We'll point it out when they try to tax and spend our way to prosperity. We'll point it out every time they do the bidding of the trial lawyers and Big Labor bosses. And we'll point it out every time they claim to solve a problem they've really only put off -- as they did just last week on Guantanamo Bay.

"The same week President Obama announced his plan to close it, we learned that a number of former detainees had resurfaced on the battle field and returned to al Qaeda. Some have admitted to their intention of killing Americans during interrogations. In my view, we should take them at their word -- and keep them where they are so long as they pose a threat to the United States.

"We need to communicate our ideas to everyone who ran away from the Republican Party in November -- and to many others. And we need to show them that our policies are developed with a human being in view, not just an abstract principle. As we do this, we should avoid the false choice of being a party of moderates or conservatives. America is diverse. The two major parties should be too. But this doesn't mean turning our backs on commonsense conservatism, or tailoring our positions to suit particular groups. Our principles are universal. They apply to everyone.

"The Republican Party puts the family first. We believe mothers and fathers make better decisions about their childrens' education than the state. We believe every life has worth and deserves protection. We believe the role of judges is to say what the law is, not what they think it ought to be. We believe workers know how to use their hard-earned money better than the Democrats running Congress. We believe all these things. And we believe most Americans agree with us. Somehow the message has been muddied. Now is the time to clear it up.

"Every so often, there comes a time when a political party has to reexamine itself. For Republicans, now is such a time. For some, the work might seem daunting. It shouldn't -- because there are signs that a revival is already taking place. Thanks to the efforts of Republicans across the country, including many of you, men and women of courage and principle are carrying our message to new audiences -- even to places where that message has long been unspoken or ignored.

"One person who heard that message is known to many of you. Two years ago, he decided to run for state office as an Independent in a strongly-Democratic city in the South. When he lost, a local Republican activist who saw potential in the young man called him up. He told him he thought he was a natural Republican -- and that he should run as one for Congress.

"When the young man's wife heard the idea, she laughed. When campaign forecasters heard about it, they said he'd never win. And when Joseph Cao was sworn into office this month, he became the first Vietnamese-born member of Congress in history and the first Republican member from New Orleans since 1891.

"Someone recently asked Congressman Cao why he became a Republican. His answer was simple: 'Because someone asked me too.'

"So my message is this: Be proud of our heritage. Be confident in our principles and our policies. Be daring in the hunt for good candidates, and tireless in recruiting them in every corner of the country. As someone from a state that used to be solid blue, I assure you: you'd be amazed at how quickly people get used to someone with an "R" after their name once he's held office a little while.

"By reaching out to more people like Joseph Cao, Republicans will not only ensure the survival and future success of our party, we'll ensure the progress and the prosperity of America. The problems we face as a nation are too serious for us to neglect this necessary work. And I have no doubt that Republicans will do nothing less to ensure a stronger, freer America in the years ahead."

Mitch McConnell, R-Ky., is the U.S. Senate minority leader.

Editor's comment: These POWERFUL words of Mitch McConnell do NOT need to be diluted by anything I can say here. I just hope the Senator understands that it is NOT the delivery of the Republican message that is at fault with the party.

It is the OBVIOUS disconnect between the Republican Party's message and the acting out or living the message that is the PROBLEM.

Labels: , , , , ,

Tuesday, January 13, 2009

Mitch And Barack: Two Men I Voted For.

Will Mitch crash Obama honeymoon?
By Halimah Abdullah - habdullah@mcclatchydc.com

WASHINGTON — Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell may be the most powerful Republican in federal government, but he will have to work hard to herd his party's dwindled caucus during President-elect Barack Obama's congressional honeymoon phase.

The Kentucky Republican, who has used filibusters to block legislation he deems unfavorable, may have to fight to keep moderate Republican Sens. Susan Collins and Olympia Snowe of Maine and Arlen Specter of Pennsylvania from joining Democrats on such key votes as the proposed $1 trillion economic stimulus package, environmental protection measures, broadening health care coverage and stem cell research. Former presidential candidate Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz., has also broken with party ranks on campaign finance reform and immigration.

The three Northeastern senators were supporters of some Democratic-backed social policy issues in the past, hail from a region of the country where the GOP's legislative ranks have significantly thinned and represent many left- to moderate-leaning voters.

Democrats have a 57-41 Senate majority, with seats in Illinois and Minnesota still being contested.

"Compared to having 49 senators, (McConnell) is in a much worse position. If he didn't have 41 he would have no power at all," said Larry Sabato, director of the University of Virginia Center for Politics. "Collins, Snowe and Specter will stick with Republicans on procedural and business and labor votes, so on some issues he will be able to hold the caucus together — especially if Democrats ride roughshod over them. But on social issues they have to survive an environment that has killed off Republicans in the Northeastern area."

This puts the three Northeastern lawmakers in a prime position to negotiate with McConnell and Republican leadership, said former Republican Sen. Lincoln Chafee, who became an independent after losing his 2006 re-election bid to represent Rhode Island.

"He'll appeal to make sure they don't abandon the entire Republican caucus," Chafee said.

The Obama administration has also made overtures to key moderate Republicans. Obama and Vice President-elect Joe Biden recently called and transition officials met with the two Maine senators to discuss the stimulus proposal.

In the meantime, McConnell has touted the spirit of bipartisanship and urged his party members to hold the line during future procedural fights to give the GOP more room to negotiate.

"He's a good mathematician and he's going to be counting votes — especially if Obama will be wading in," Chafee said. "And if the Obama people are smart they won't depend on a razor-thin margin to prevent filibusters."

Obama's proposed economic stimulus package may prove one of the first tests of McConnell's ability to keep his party in line.

McConnell's "going to try and get Republican priorities into the stimulus bill" and that will require negotiating with moderate Republicans, said Michele Swers, an associate professor of American government at Georgetown University.

"Democrats will be concentrating on getting votes over to their sides. Moderate Republicans and the conservative Democrats are in a prime position because they can be the turning point," she said. Collins, Snowe and Specter "will ask for certain things for Maine or Pennsylvania."

Republicans have made it clear they want Obama's economic stimulus package to reflect generous tax cuts and limits on spending. And since they will have the 40 votes needed to halt debate, they will still have a prominent role in shaping the legislation.

McConnell said he wants at least two elements to be key parts of the plan: A reduction of the 25 percent tax rate now paid by middle-class taxpayers to 15 percent, and aid to states as loans, not grants. He and House Republican Leader John Boehner, R-Ohio, made other requests: That there be full hearings, and that the federal debt not go up too sharply.

"We know at least two states that don't need the money," McConnell said.

The governors of South Carolina and Texas have said they do not need the additional funds. Congress is not capable of monitoring state-by-state spending, McConnell said, adding that "the way to make sure it's spent judiciously is to make it a loan."

Meanwhile, Democratic leaders have already warned that a filibuster on the economic stimulus will further weaken the Republican brand. McConnell, who met with Obama last week to discuss the package, has said he doesn't want to just give the president-elect a "blank check."

"Now he's not carrying the water for a president," Swers said. "The Republican Party in Congress is separate from White House. He doesn't have to convince or represent views of the president. If Obama has support, and McConnell doesn't want to be viewed as obstructionist, he'll go along. If he sees an opening, he'll take it."

Halimah Abdullah is the Herald-Leader's Washington correspondent. Reach her at (202) 383-6055.

Labels: ,

Thursday, December 11, 2008

Ya'll Send A Shout Out To Senator Mitch McConnell. Read more below.

McConnell on auto aid: "We simply cannot ask the American taxpayer to subsidize failure"
Posted by JimCarroll at 12/11/2008 11:55 AM EST on courier-journal.com

Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell, R-Ky., is not going to help his outgoing president, George W. Bush, provide a $15 billion aid package to the auto industry.

McConnell has just announced his opposition to the auto aid plan, which passed the House last night.

The emergency bridge loan legislation was negotiated between the Bush White House and Democratic congressional leaders.

McConnell's opposition poses a serious threat to the bill's survival in the Senate. The measure needs 60 votes for passage, and that would require help from Republicans.

Here is what McConnell just told his colleagues:

"These are indeed turbulent times for the U.S. economy. Over the past several months, Americans have seen giant companies fail, significant job losses, and, after unprecedented problems in the credit markets, the frightening prospect of total disarray within our nation’s Main Street economy.

"The crisis in the credit markets came at us quickly. We were told that urgent government action was needed in order to shore up the broader economy – and that failure to act would lead to a complete collapse of consumer credit, the very lifeblood of our nation’s economy.

"Now under ordinary circumstances, I would have opposed such a measure. Government intervention in the marketplace frankly cuts against all my ordinary impulses. But this was not an ordinary event. I, and many others, believed that extraordinary action was needed to protect millions of ordinary Americans from the colossal and far-reaching mistakes of a few. And action was taken.

"The systemic breakdown that some envisioned has not occurred, so there is reason to believe that the medicine has had some effect. But, on the whole, the overall economy continues to struggle. Some industries have been hit harder than others. And one of them certainly is the auto industry.

"The problems in the auto industry have been long in the making. But last month the situation grew so dire that American automobile makers came to Washington with an urgent appeal for federal help. Over the past few weeks, lawmakers have taken the time to examine the problems at these companies and the solutions that they have been proposed. And now the American taxpayers are being asked to put their money behind a plan that is aimed at helping these companies survive.

"Republicans received that plan late yesterday morning – about this time yesterday. We reviewed it closely to see if it meets the criteria that I have laid out repeatedly for taxpayer protections and an effective strategy for securing the long-term viability of these companies. In the end, I concluded that it does not.

"In some ways, the proposal that was worked out by the White House and congressional Democrats appears tough. It calls on struggling auto companies and autoworkers to make the sort of sacrifices they have not been accustomed to making in the past. It also includes time limits as a way of hastening necessary reforms. But in reality, this proposal isn’t nearly tough enough.

"A primary weakness relates to the so-called ‘car czar,’ who has nearly unlimited power to allocate taxpayer dollars but limited ability to force the kinds of tough concessions that long-term viability would require.

"Another problem lies outside the proposal itself. And here I’m referring to the type of government action that’s being contemplated. Somewhat lost in the recent debate over the auto industry is the fundamental difference between it and the financial rescue plan that Congress approved in October. While that plan was intended to rescue the entire economy, this one is intended to save a single industry. That plan was intended to help everyone – from small business owners to college students; and every lawmaker who voted for it acted on the belief that that's exactly what it would do.

"A failure to appreciate this distinction has caused a number of other industries and even a number of municipalities across the country to prepare their own proposals for a government rescue as all Americans weather the tough economy. It has also created the impression in some minds that the federal government is picking favorites, and that favored businesses get help while others don’t.

"A lot of struggling Americans are asking where their bailout is. They wonder why one business would get support over another. When it comes to the auto industry, many Republicans in Congress have asked these same questions.

"There are many principled reasons to oppose this bill. But the simplest one is also the best: 'a government big enough to give us everything we want is a government big enough to take everything we have.' This is as true for individuals as it is for business. It’s the primary principle upon which American industry, including the auto industry, was built. And even in turbulent moments like this – perhaps especially at moments like this – it’s a principle well worth defending.

"Now some argue that the effects of an auto industry collapse would be too acute and far-reaching for an already-struggling economy to bear. This is impossible to know. And even if we grant that these companies would fail without taxpayer help, we would still have to ask ourselves whether the proposal before us achieves the goal that everyone claims to embrace – namely, the long-term viability of ailing car companies – in my view, it does not.

"I have already enumerated some of the weaknesses in the plan. But in the end, its greatest single flaw is that it promises taxpayer money today for reforms that may or may not come tomorrow. And we would not be serving the American taxpayer well if we spent their hard-earned money without knowing with certainty that their investment would result in stronger, leaner automobile companies that would not need additional taxpayer help just a few months or weeks down the road.

"We simply cannot ask the American taxpayer to subsidize failure.

"All Americans, including myself, are worried about the future of our nation’s automakers. These companies have a venerable place in the story of modern America. They continue to provide hundreds of thousands of jobs across the country, including 50,000 auto-related jobs in my own home state of Kentucky.

"But many Americans are also worried about the prospect of the government intervening on behalf of some industries and not intervening on behalf of others – especially when there is no guarantee – no guarantee – that the interventions will work. They wonder when the spending stops. If I were to vote in favor of this bill, I would not have a very good answer for them.

"The best route for the long-term viability of ailing car companies may be a rocky one. Government help is not the only option. It’s not even the best option. Long-term viability is still possible. But it’s only possible if these companies are forced to make the tough choices necessary for their survival.

"My colleague, Senator (Bob) Corker (R-Tenn.), has proposed an amendment that would go a long way toward improving this bill. In keeping with the principles I’ve outlined before in these comments this morning, the Corker amendment does not just encourage reform – it doesn’t just encourage reform – it requires reform. And it does so with crucial specificity. First, participating companies would be required to reduce their outstanding debt by at least two-thirds through an equity swap with bondholders.

"The Corker amendment also requires that labor costs at participating companies be brought on par with companies like Nissan, Toyota, which I also have in my state, and Honda – not tomorrow but immediately – because it is delusional to think that a company which spends $71 per labor hour could compete with a company in the same industry that spends $49 per labor hour.

"The Corker amendment would improve the liquidity and cash-flow of automakers by requiring that a portion of the payments made to the union accounts consist of company stock.

"And finally, the Corker amendment would require participating companies to file for Chapter 11 reorganization if any of these conditions – if any of these conditions – aren’t met by a fixed date.

"The Corker amendment forces necessary reforms, holds companies accountable, and assures taxpayers that these companies won’t be back for more. If legislative action were necessary, the Corker proposal would make many much-needed and dramatic improvements to the underlying bill.

"I, like all of my colleagues, want the U.S. auto industry not only to survive but to thrive. And by cutting costs, streamlining production, increasing fuel efficiency, and investing in new technologies and attractive, more competitive designs, American auto companies will once again make cars that people all over the world will want to buy. Then Americans will be able to say again with pride that our cars are the best.

"In addition protecting the taxpayer – this is a goal that Republicans have been fighting hard for in this debate. And in my view, it’s a goal that's well worth our efforts."

Editor's comment: Thank you, Senator Mitch McConnell for providing NEEDED leadership on this bailout pig with lipstick, since President Bush has abdicated ANY responsibilities on this or any other issues whatsoever!

Labels: ,

Tuesday, November 18, 2008

Another Quick Update: Senator Mitch McConnell Has Been Re-elected Senate Minority Leader. Congratulations, Senator.



This post will be updated with an official press release, as soon as the same is issued.

In the meantime, our well deserved congratulations go out to Senator Mitch McConnell.

Update at 5:24 P. M.: Below's the press release I promised you:

Office of US Senator Mitch McConnell
For Immediate Release, Tuesday, November 18, 2008

Senator McConnell Re-elected Senate Republican Leader

WASHINGTON, D.C. – The U.S. Senate Republican Conference held Leadership elections for the 111th Congress on Tuesday and Senator McConnell was unanimously re-elected by his colleagues to serve as Republican Leader.

“I am honored that my colleagues re-elected me to serve as the Republican Leader in the 111th Congress,” McConnell said. “As Republican Leader, I will continue to use my clout to advance Kentucky’s interests and to ensure that our voice is heard.”

The results are as follows:

Republican Leader, Sen. Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.)
Republican Whip, Sen. Jon Kyl (R-Ariz.)
Republican Conference Chair, Sen. Lamar Alexander (R-Tenn.)
Republican Policy Committee Chairman, Sen. John Ensign (R-Nev.)
Republican Conference Vice Chair, John Thune (R-S.D.)
National Republican Senatorial Committee Chairman, John Cornyn (R-Texas)


“We’ve assembled a great team which stands ready to protect American taxpayers by cutting spending, paying down the national debt, and moving our nation toward energy independence,” McConnell said. “We are eager to work with our Democrat colleagues to forge bipartisan agreements and implement real legislative accomplishments.”

Senator McConnell is only the second Kentuckian to lead his party in the U.S. Senate. The only other Senator from Kentucky to serve as his party’s leader was Alben Barkley. Senator Barkley (D-KY) served as majority leader for nearly 10 years, from 1937 to 1947, longer than anyone else before him. From 1947 to 1949 he served as minority leader, and in 1948 he was elected vice president to President Truman.

Labels:

Thursday, November 06, 2008

Well, I'll Be. Louisville Courier Journal Editors "Salute[] McConnell". I Guess It's NOW Kiss Mitch Since "Ditch Mitch" Efforts FAILED MISERABLY.

Saluting McConnell


Sen. Mitch McConnell has survived a political near-death experience. He deserves congratulations on a hard-earned re-election victory that showed Kentuckians value his knowledge, experience and influence.

His Democratic opponent, Bruce Lunsford, deserves the thanks of all Kentuckians for holding Mr. McConnell accountable in an expensive, exhausting and ultimately (for him and his supporters) frustrating campaign.

As we move toward Barack Obama's presidency, Mr. McConnell should put his considerable skills and energies to work in solving the problems that loom so darkly: an economy that needs resuscitation, a financial system that needs reorganization, two wars that need prudent resolution, a health case system that needs remodeling, an energy policy that needs replacing, an infrastructure that needs rebuilding.

As Mr. McConnell told our editorial board recently, his advice to a new administration would be to think big and work together. That's what he himself did, in helping to shape and pass the financial system bailout bill. It's what he has done in some other notable instances, to help pass a tobacco buyout, support Burma's pro-democracy movement and enact a Medicare prescription drug benefit. It's what he should do as the most powerful Republican in post-Bush Washington.

It's time to get to work. America needs the best ideas and the best efforts of its most influential leaders. And the Senate minority leader's best self is not only determined and purposeful but also strategically and tactically masterful. He can make a difference.

Editor's comment:

One would think, reading this editorial piece, that the Courier-Journal has always being in love with Senator Mitch McConnell, rather than the reverse being the truth!

I guess since the paper's all out efforts to "Ditch Mitch" FAILED MISERABLY, the Courier-Journal is NOW employing a NEW tactic:

KISS MITCH!!

*SIGH*!!!

Labels:

Friday, October 31, 2008

Mitch McConnell Retaliates, Releases Hound Dogs On Bruce Lunsford. Watch And Laugh, And Then Stick With Mitch.

Below is Mitch's ad:



Below is Bruce Lunsford's earlier ad before Mitch ZINGED him with the above ad:

Labels:

Senate Endorsement: Is There ANY Doubt That Senator Mitch McConnell Needs To Be Sent Back To Washington, D. C.? I Did NOT Think So.


Instead of writing a piece here, I'll just let you know that 9 of Kentucky's 11 newspapers largest newspapers enthusiastically endorsed his candidacy.

The two that did NOT?

Louisville Courier Journal and Lexington Herald Leader.

And I'll post these comments below for your consideration. Democrats have had their fun "ribbing" Mitch McConnell, but it is NOW time to get serious since the election is in a few days.

Read below in Mitch's own words and stick with Mitch:

... this election is about which candidate can do the most for the people of Kentucky over the next six years. It is about whether it makes sense to throw away the experience of a senator who built the clout to consistently deliver for Kentuckians.

Most Kentuckians understand we aren't guaranteed a seat at the table. Californians have 55 elected officials in Congress fighting to ban offshore drilling for American oil and promoting their San Francisco values. In Kentucky, we only have eight advocates to speak on our behalf in Washington. Therefore, it is essential that the people we send to Washington have the clout and influence necessary to put Kentucky's priorities at the top of the Senate's agenda.

Beyond the clear lack of influence my opponent would have in the Senate, delivering for Kentucky means taking tough stands on the most important issues of our time without regard to your own political pursuits. It means putting Kentuckians' interests ahead of your own.

Labels: ,

Thursday, October 30, 2008

"RECORDGATE" Update: Lunsford Says He'll Tell Marshall County Grand Jury He was "Illegally Bugged".

Lunsford: He'll tell grand jury he was 'illegally bugged'
By Joseph Gerth

Democrat Bruce Lunsford's campaign says he will tell a Marshall County grand jury that a Republican operative "illegally bugged" his speaking platform during a debate in Western Kentucky.

The grand jury will consider a complaint by Richard St. Onge III, an employee of the National Republican Senatorial Committee, who claimed that Lunsford took his digital recorder after the debate and that Lunsford's staff erased it.

Jason Darnall, an assistant Marshall County attorney, said the grand jury will decide if any crimes were committed, and that he will not make a recommendation. The jury is set to meet Nov. 7.

Surreptitiously recording someone is a class D felony.

St. Onge put the recorder on Lunsford's rostrum. Ed Hart, Lunsford's campaign chairman, said St. Onge never asked permission to do so, and the campaign has said it was hidden under a notebook.

Rebecca Fisher, a spokeswoman for the Republican committee, said St. Onge didn't hide the recorder and was simply trying to obtain a good recording.

In a statement by Lunsford spokeswoman Lindsey Berman, the campaign suggested Sen. Mitch McConnell is using the incident to deflect attention from issues such as the economy, the Bush presidency and the conviction of Republican Sen. Ted Stevens of Alaska on corruption charges:

"We'll be happy to tell the story of how McConnell's people illegally bugged Bruce's podium. In the meantime, we'll keep talking about how Mitch McConnell, George Bush and Ted Stevens have nearly destroyed our economy and the trust of the American people."

After the debate last Thursday at Kentucky Dam Village State Resort Park, Lunsford picked up the recorder and handed it to an aide. It was returned after St. Onge complained to the Marshall County sheriff. St. Onge said more than 65 recordings were erased.

Reporter Joseph Gerth can be reached at (502) 582-4702.


Editor's comment: This could get U-G-L-Y!

Labels:

Wednesday, October 29, 2008

Democrats Take Issue With Mitch McConnell's Senate CLOUT. I Beg To Differ, Don't You? Watch The Video Ad.

Now, The Videos From Youtube. Sorry For The Late Posting.

Part #1:




Part #2:

Labels:

More Pictures.

I Just Returned A While Ago From Mitch McConnell's Rally In Bowling Green. Watch Pictures.








Click on pictures to enlarge them.

Labels: