Google
 
Web Osi Speaks!

Saturday, May 14, 2011

Reading The "Hand Writing On The Wall" Forces MF Mike Huck A Bee Out Of White House Race. Good Riddance, For Sure! Watch Video.


Follower of Jesus Christ, eh?

I don't recall Jesus Christ bearing FALSE witness against HIS neighbor.

Oh, wait a minute, Jesus Christ did preach against that notion.

What a FRAUD!

As for me, I was going to do my UTMOST BEST to help ensure the only way he sees 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue, Washington, DC, will be by driving past the address!

Labels: , , ,

Sunday, May 23, 2010

Jesus Christ WARNED Us Of FALSE Prophets -- And We Still Refuse To Listen.

On a Visit to the U.S., a Nigerian Witch-Hunter Explains Herself
By Michael Stravato for The New York Times



Helen Ukpabio, author of “Unveiling the Mysteries of Witchcraft,” preached last week to a small group in Houston. She is the subject of an HBO documentary.

HOUSTON — At home in Nigeria, the Pentecostal preacher Helen Ukpabio draws thousands to her revival meetings. Last August, when she had herself consecrated Christendom’s first “lady apostle,” Nigerian politicians and Nollywood actors attended the ceremony. Her books and DVDs, which explain how Satan possesses children, are widely known.

So well-known, in fact, that Ms. Ukpabio’s critics say her teachings have contributed to the torture or abandonment of thousands of Nigerian children — including infants and toddlers — suspected of being witches and warlocks. Her culpability is a central contention of “Saving Africa’s Witch Children,” a documentary that made its American debut Wednesday on HBO2.

Those disturbed by the needless immiseration of innocent children should beware. “Saving Africa’s Witch Children” follows Gary Foxcroft, founder of the charity Stepping Stones Nigeria, as he travels the rural state of Akwa Ibom, rescuing children abused during horrific “exorcisms” — splashed with acid, buried alive, dipped in fire — or abandoned roadside, cast out of their villages because some itinerant preacher called them possessed.

Their fellow villagers have often seen DVDs of “End of the Wicked,” Ms. Ukpabio’s bloody 1999 movie purporting to show how the devil captures children’s souls. And some have read her book “Unveiling the Mysteries of Witchcraft,” where she confidently writes that “if a child under the age of 2 screams in the night, cries and is always feverish with deteriorating health, he or she is a servant of Satan.”

Visiting Houston last week to lead a four-night revival for a local church, Ms. Ukpabio, 41, had no idea that “Saving Africa’s Witch Children,” which brought protesters out to greet her in London, was about to be shown in the United States. But she was eager to defend herself.

“Do you think Harry Potter is real?” Ms. Ukpabio asked me angrily, in the lobby of the Holiday Inn Express where she was staying. “It is only because I am African,” she said, that people who understand that J. K. Rowling writes fiction would take literally Ms. Ukpabio’s filmic depictions of possessed children, gathering by moonlight to devour human flesh.

Still, “Saving Africa’s Witch Children” makes clear that many rural Nigerians do take her film seriously. And in her sermons, Ms. Ukpabio is emphatic that children can be possessed, and that with her God-given “powers of discernment,” she can spot such a child. Belief in possession is especially common among Pentecostals in Nigeria, where it reinforces native traditions that spirits are real and intervene in human affairs.

In Nigeria, many preachers not only identify possessed children but charge dearly to perform exorcisms. To redeem their children’s souls — and to keep the child from being killed or banished by neighbors — parents scrimp or borrow to pay the preacher.

Ms. Ukpabio argued that “Saving Africa’s Witch Children” exaggerates or invents the problem of child abandonment. Asked how she could be so sure, she said, “because I am an African!” In Africa, she said, “family ties are too strong to have a child on the street.”

The Children’s Rights and Rehabilitation Network, a school for abandoned children run by Sam Itauma and featured in Mr. Foxcroft’s documentary, is “a 419 scam,” Ms. Ukpabio said, referring to the section in Nigeria’s criminal code that deals with fraud.

She said the children’s gruesome scars and wounds, shown in the documentary, are not real — or perhaps they are real, “but there are many ways children can get maimed.” And if the injuries are the result of witchcraft accusations against the children, she said, those accusations could not have been made by Pentecostal Christian preachers, but by charlatans.

Since “Saving Africa’s Witch Children” was first shown in Britain, in 2008, Mr. Itauma’s home state has adopted a law against accusing children of witchcraft. But Ms. Ukpabio went on the offensive by suing the state government, Mr. Foxcroft, Mr. Itauma and Leo Igwe, a Nigerian antisuperstition activist.

In the lawsuit, Ms. Ukpabio alleges that the state law infringes on her freedom of religion. She seeks 2 billion naira (about $13 million) in damages, as well as “an order of perpetual injunction restraining the respondents” from interfering with or otherwise denouncing her church’s “right to practice their religion and the Christian religious belief in the existence of God, Jesus Christ, Satan, sin, witchcraft, heaven and hellfire.”

In other words, in the name of religious freedom, Ms. Ukpabio seeks a gag order on anyone who disagrees with her.

The lawsuit also reiterates Ms. Ukpabio’s contention that Stepping Stones Nigeria and Mr. Itauma’s school are not charities but extortionate front organizations. According to Ms. Ukpabio, Mr. Foxcroft and Mr. Itauma aim not to educate abandoned children but “to use the said funds to blackmail.”

“We’re a registered charity in the U. K., so we publish our accounts,” said Mr. Foxcroft by phone in England. “She can come in and see how much money we raised and where we spend it.”

In Houston, Ms. Ukpabio reiterated that the state should close Mr. Itauma’s school. To the children living there — who, according to her, may be actors or witches, but if witches, they were not abused, and if abused, then certainly not by Christians — Ms. Ukpabio offered the services of her own church.

The school “does not understand demonic possession,” she said. “If they understood, they would take the children to Liberty Gospel.

“We would deliver them!”

Labels:

Tuesday, November 06, 2007

Posting the Ten Commandments on the eve of election fools NO one. Daniel will still reveal message of "The Hand Writing On The Wall".

Yesterday, just hours before voters go to the polls to pass judgment on Fletcher's reign, and facing a rout at the polls, Fletcher had an epiphany and posted the Ten Commandments in the Capitol rotunda.

While I have been consistent in urging the posting of the Decalogue in some public places, such as on Capitol (and county) grounds, this belated action by Fletcher is a CRASS and SHAMEFUL political PLOY.

Posting the Ten Commandments in this manner and on the eve of election fools NO one -- NOT this writer anyway. It will not STOP what is politically inevitable -- the ouster of Fletcher -- and it will NOT STOP Daniel from revealing the secret code behind "The Hand Writing On The Wall".

Stay tuned.

Labels: , ,

Monday, November 05, 2007

Richard "Tricky Dick" Nixon must be proud of this last minute "desperation" act, as "spooky" halloween season refuses to end.

Richard "Tricky Dick" Nixon must be proud of this last minute "desperation" act, as the "spooky" halloween season refuses to end. Check out the story, listen to the "last minute desperation" act -- guess who is behind it -- and listen to Beshear's response.

IT IS BEYOND PATHETIC: It is NOW a darn SHAME that some are NOT going to recover from, politically (and probably, professionally) speaking!

Labels: , , ,

Tuesday, October 30, 2007

Attorney General candidates hurl "political grenades" at each other.


Stan Lee on Jack Conway

Jack Conway on Stan Lee

Who's bearing false witness you ask? PolWatchers has an idea.

Labels: ,

Friday, October 26, 2007

*** Fletcher's campaign message is NOT resonating outside of his base of support! ***

According to the new Herald-Leader/Action News 36 Election Poll previously reported on here, Fletcher's campaign messages are falling on deaf ears outside of his base of support.

Here, excerpted, is John Stamper's report on it:

The list of failed campaign messages is long:

* Fletcher says Democratic challenger Steve Beshear’s values don’t match those of most Kentuckians. According to the telephone survey of 600 likely voters, 44 percent disagree, while 42 percent agree with the governor.

"Man does that say it all," said Del Ali, president of the Olney, Md.-based firm Research 2000 that conducted the poll. "That’s something Fletcher should be up 20 or 25 points on" if he expects to win.

* Fletcher says Beshear acted unethically as a lawyer trying to salvage Kentucky Central Life Insurance Co. Only 38 percent of those surveyed agree, while 47 percent disagree.

Arguments about ethics are "just not credible" coming from Fletcher, who was damaged politically by an investigation of state hiring practices, said Richard Fording, an associate professor of political science at the University of Kentucky.

* Fletcher says he deserves another four years in office based on his accomplishments as governor. But 59 percent of those surveyed disapprove of the governor’s job performance, compared to 38 percent who approve.

"The vast majority of Kentuckians are ready for a change," Beshear said in response to Fletcher’s approval rating.

* Fletcher says he pardoned his administration during an investigation of state hiring practices to spare them from a Democratic "witch hunt." According to the poll, 56 percent believe Fletcher’s pardons were unethical, while 36 percent side with Fletcher.

Fletcher’s campaign spokesman, Jason Keller, blamed those numbers on ads from an outside Democratic group that he said only tell half of the hiring investigation story.

The ads, run by a group called Bluegrass Freedom Fund, highlight the fact that a grand jury indicted Fletcher and several key aides and that Fletcher invoked his Fifth Amendment protection against self incrimination when he appeared before a grand jury.

The ads do not note that the charges against Fletcher were dismissed in an agreement the governor signed with Attorney General Greg Stumbo or that the Executive Branch Ethics Commission dropped its investigation of Fletcher, citing a lack of evidence.

"The key part of that story is conveniently left out," Keller said.

The only bright spot for Fletcher in the poll, which has a margin of error of plus or minus 4 percentage points, is that a slim plurality of voters agree with Fletcher’s anti-casino stance.

Forty percent of those surveyed agree that casinos will bring more social ills, while 33 percent agree with Beshear that casinos will create needed tax dollars for education and health care.

However, that stance has apparently moved very few voters to Fletcher, given that an overwhelming majority disagree with Fletcher on whether they should get to vote on the issue.

In a Herald-Leader/Action News 36 poll conducted last month, 82 percent of likely voters said they want to vote on the issue.

"Fletcher’s message is resonating, but only with his base," said Michael Baranowski, a political scientist at Northern Kentucky University. "He hasn’t been able to expand his coalition beyond his base and that’s why he’s going to lose."

Exemplifying Baranowski’s analysis is the fact that 73 percent of Republicans surveyed agree that Beshear acted unethically in the Kentucky Central case, while only 9 percent of Democrats and 36 percent of Independents agreed.

Further, after watching two weeks of commercials that criticized Beshear’s role in the liquidation of Kentucky Central, the governor managed to sway to his camp only 3 percent of Democrats, 4 percent of Republicans and 5 percent of Independents.

Keller concedes that the governor’s message hasn’t gotten through to as many voters as hoped, but he remains optimistic that will change before Nov. 6.

"There’s two weeks left here and the governor is campaigning hard throughout the state," Keller said. "We still have time to communicate the message."

Political observers are more than a little skeptical. "He’s thrown the kitchen sink at Beshear and it didn’t stick," Ali said.

My view? You can blame or praise (depending on where you stand) the 527, Bluegrass Freedom Fund, for their VERY EFFECTIVE ads assault -- more like a German "Blitzkrieg" -- on Fletcher, particularly this DEVASTATING one:

Labels: ,

Wednesday, October 24, 2007

*** The legalization of illegality: "Bone-headed" ideas out of Lexington, Kentucky! ***

If you live in Lexington, Kentucky, you have to wonder what kind of people your Mayor puts on his Commission on Immigration who came up with this "bone-headed" idea!

It is as if the Commission does NOT understand that illegal immigrants are law breakers who deserve to be punished for breaking our (immigration) laws. The Commission's recommendations, amongst them is the IRRESPONSIBLE (and probably unconstitutional) plan to issue illegal immigrants driver's licenses and IDs, has touched off a firestorm of sorts -- and RIGHTLY so.

This firestorm included politicians, who could NOT pass up a chance to jump on the bandwagon and score political points, though some of them previously IGNORED the issue.

In fact in 2002 while a Congressman, Fletcher voted for AMNESTY FOR ILLEGAL IMMIGRANTS, see his rating!! Now he assumes position on the other side of the issue in order to ride it for what's it's worth!!!

Speaking of politics while ignoring some politicians, Lexingtonians should keep those who voted for the implementation of these measures in mind come election time.

What is next, a plan to make illegal immigrants legal, by rewarding their illegal behavior with all rights and privileges reserved for citizens?

My goodness -- what is our country becoming -- a land of the free and LAWLESS?

Labels: , ,

Tuesday, October 16, 2007

In case you missed the KET Governor candidates' debate last night, here it is.

In case you missed the KET Governor candidates' debate last night, here's the video link.

Share your thoughts with us, if you don't mind, and if you are registered to comment here..

Labels: ,

Steve Beshear responds to Fletcher claims at KET debate.

Beshear/Mongiardo Respond to Fletcher's Claims at KET Debate

Time: 8:04 & 8:08

Fletcher Rhetoric:

Compare that to Steve Beshear's Kentucky Enron and where you have a report of experts, as well as an expert law firm, give the opinion that he broke the contract and two ethical rules and not only that but that report was hidden for twelve years. It's interesting that it was hidden by the same judge who is working for him now. Steve Beshear made a great deal of money out of that…Let me say the report was fairly clear there were some breaches of the contract another firm looked at it and called it malpractice. Said there were ethical breaches. Why do you hide a report if there is nothing wrong and the same judge that is coming out now, Steve, is the same judge that signed off and said yes this report is accurate as these were done you were taken off the case, fired, and you said you did not even remember that, you said you did not remember the investigation.

REALITY

Herald Leader: Beshear's Law Firm Rescued Victims, Recovered $300 Million. According to a Herald Leader editorial subtitled, "Candidate's old law firm rescued victims of insurer's collapse," "Beshear, the Democratic nominee for governor, had nothing to do with the collapse of this once-proud Lexington company…Beshear was part of the legal force that chased the real culprits through the courts…Altogether, more than $300 million has been recovered and returned to policyholders and creditors."
[Herald Leader, 7/8/07]

Media Agrees: Investigative Report Cleared Beshear.

• State Journal: "There was no conflict on Beshear's part, the report…found." [ State Journal, 10/9/07]
• Courier Journal : "Voters may safely ignore the Kentucky Central issue…As campaign ammunition, Kentucky Central is no cannonball. It's a dud." [Courier Journal, 10/9/07]
• WHAS Reporter Mark Hebert: "The 12-year-old investigative report on Stites and Harbison's conflict of interest in the Kentucky Central Life Insurance liquidation has produced no 'smoking gun' that Steve Beshear did anything wrong,"
Associated Press: "Beshear Not Responsible for Kentucky Central Conflict." "The Cincinnati law firm of Porter, Wright, Morris & Arthur, which compiled the report, concluded that neither Beshear nor any other Stites & Harbison attorney working on the Kentucky Central case were involved in or responsible for the conflict of interest."
Independent Judge and Fletcher Supporter: No Ethical Problems by Beshear or Stites.

• "[Judge Richard Revell] said from what he recalled, he 'absolutely did not' find any ethical problems on the part of Beshear," according to the Courier Journal. [Courier Journal, 9/26/07]
• "Retired Jefferson County Circuit Judge Richard Revell, who was brought into the Kentucky Central case specifically to look into the actions of Beshear and his former law firm, has also dismissed the matter, recently calling it 'a dead issue,'" according to the Associated Press. "It's up to the Kentucky Supreme Court to decide whether an attorney has violated any ethical codes, and that hasn't happened in this situation, said Revell, a Republican who says he supports Fletcher. 'For someone to be using it as a campaign allegation, it's meaningless in my mind,' Revell said. [Associated Press, 10/13/07]
• "Richard Revell…said yesterday that the state GOP needs to abort its line of attack," according to a Courier Journal article entitled "Judge: Beshear acted ethically." "It has absolutely no merit," Revell said. "They have gotten themselves into a position that is totally insupportable." [Courier Journal, 10/10/07]• "Revell said…he 'came to the conclusion that there was no ethics violation by Stites & Harbison.'" [Herald Leader, 10/10/07]

Time: 8:13

Fletcher Rhetoric:


I don't think Steve is aligned with the values of the people of Kentucky. You look at his stand on abortion and the fact that a child wasn't recognized as having Constitutional rights until it was born and the partial-birth abortion issue.

REALITY

Beshear Voted for Abortion Restrictions. As a state legislator, Steve Beshear voted for a law adding numerous restrictions on abortions including: parental consent for minors; requirement that doctors inform woman of potential physical and mental consequences of abortion; a ban on abortions after the first trimester except in cases where the life or health of the mother is at stake; and fines and jail penalties for doctors and any persons who violate the law. [SB 259, 3/20/74, 80-7]

Time: 8:14

Fletcher Rhetoric:


You look at his gun stances now, back then he was for gun control and now he's says that he's for gun rights and what you find is an individual who is out of step with Kentucky values.

REALITY

Beshear Has A Rating from NRA. Steve Beshear and Dan Mongiardo have received an A rating from the National Rifle Association.

Time: 8:15

Fletcher Rhetoric:


I think there's a real question there when you're signing a legal document, and you put down that you have an individual spouse when its two males uh and the constitution forbids marriage and spouse, I think it was a representative I don't think it was Steve personally that signed that we don't sign our own finance reports but I think that bears the question I think the people need to know out here if he recognizes that on his campaign finance report.

REALITY

Beshear Believes Marriage Is Between Man and Woman. "Actually, Beshear didn't sign his spending report, his campaign treasurer did," said the WHAS 11 Blog. "Beshear has said he supports marriage between a man and a woman."

Labels: ,

Saturday, October 06, 2007

The "hissing sound" you hear is from a DEFLATING politically inspired "hot air balloon".

Many have speculated that there is a "smoking gun" that surrounds Steve Beshear's role in the Central Kentucky Insurance debacle.

Like a nurturing and concerned parent, I have tried to get those indulging in "unbridled" speculation in this matter to await the release of the so called "secret" report, while making it CLEAR that the MOST offense Steve Beshear -- and/or his law firm -- may have been guilty of is NOT avoiding the appearane of impropriety or maybe even some ethical lapses that had them representing both sides of a conflict in this matter without FIRST getting a release from the parties involved to do so -- an issue BEST addressed by the affected parties and the BAR Association.

Now with the report I have, once again, been proven CORRECT, but I doubt that is going to disuade the conspirators from indulging in their art.

Listen folks, LET ME SAY IT -- AGAIN -- THERE IS NO SMOKING GUN BECAUSE THERE WAS NO GUN TO BEGIN WITH.

AND THE "HISSING SOUND" YOU HEAR IS FROM A DEFLATING POLITICALLY INSPIRED "HOT AIR BALLOON"

Labels: , , , , ,

Wednesday, October 03, 2007

Talking about the U. S. Supreme Court: Justice Clarence Thomas is STILL bitter after all these years.


United States Supreme Court Justice, Clarence Thomas has penned a new book (picture of the book is on your right hand side) and given an interview to Steve Croft of CNN, which suggests that this "Son of his Grandfather" is STILL bitter after all these years, since his "Anita Hill uppity lynching" moment.

The question is: Does he have a right to STILL be bitter after all these years?

Justice Thomas' interview (#1 of 3)

(#2 of 3)

(#3 of 3)

Update: Now Anita Hill has responded in kind on a NYT Op-ed, and on video making it CLEAR that she told the truth!

Did she?

Labels: , , ,

Tuesday, October 02, 2007

Beshear's new ad takes Fletcher to task.


What do you think of Beshear's new ad?

Labels: ,

Sunday, September 30, 2007

*** Breaking news: Fletcher's new ad is NOT about casinos, ... ***

... yep, you heard it right. I got so TIRED of the casino ads that I STOPPED posting them here. I figured you were TIRED of watching them, too. I guess you can say that someone FINALLY listened and left that "dead horse" alone.

The new ad deals with Kentucky Central Insurance affair. I watched it last night on T. V. and I will update this post by placing the ad here for you to see for yourself -- and I will analyze -- it pronto.

Good night, y'all.

Update: Here's the ad:


My view? First, the fact that the ad DOESN'T BORE us to DEATH with gambling/casino deserves a BIG thanks. Second, to analyze this ad DEMANDS a first read from Pat Crowley's post.

Here is an excerpt: Fletcher hits Beshear for the role he and his law firm played in the liquidation of KY Central Insurance. While true Beshear's firm did collect $21 million for its work, given the size of the bankruptcy that is not an outrageous number when put into perspective. But neither Beshear nor his firm had anything to do with people losing jobs and investments, as the ad hints. That happened when the company went down; Beshear and his firm came in to clean up the mess.

My sentiments, EXACTLY, Pat.

Then you have the claim in the ad that Steve Beshear's firm paid a $100,000.00 to cover up an ethics investigation.

THERE IS NO EVIDENCE TO SUGGEST THAT BESHEAR'S FIRM PAID TO COVER UP AN ETHICS INVESTIGATION.

It defies CREDIBILITY to suggest otherwise, and I will now create a new post label for the blog to dissuade "Bearing false witness."

NOTE: One thing, though, is this message from Jason Keller, spokes person from the Fletcher campaign, which I think is appropriate in this matter:

Releasing that report would clear up the mystery surrounding the agreement.
Stephens said he doesn’t recall Beshear being cited for anything improper. And no one is accusing Beshear of any wrongdoing (Curiously, I thought this accusation was THE essence of Fletcher's new ad).

But the curious decision to conceal the results of an ethics investigation — what is the point of an investigation if the results are kept confidential? — and the even more curious memory lapse of a candidate for governor in the middle of it raise some questions that ought to be answered between now and November. The Franklin County Circuit Court should release the ethics report. Steve Beshear should insist on it.

Please note that Steve Beshear has already called for the report to be released and ONLY the court, NOT he, can order it released!

Labels: ,