Google
 
Web Osi Speaks!

Thursday, December 23, 2010

Lexington Herald Leader: "Kentucky Needs To Control Rising Cost Of Corrections". I AGREE With This Self Evident Truth!

Kentucky needs to control rising cost of corrections
By Tom Handy and Guthrie True

It is uncommon, especially in these days of polarizing political rhetoric, to find two people with significantly different points of view working toward the same goal. Yet that is exactly the situation we find ourselves in as members of a state task force that is looking for solutions to Kentucky's big and growing challenges in corrections spending.

One of us is a veteran prosecutor and former commonwealth's attorney, the other a longtime criminal defense attorney and former public defender. In a courtroom, we would find ourselves on opposite sides of the room.

However as members of the Task Force on the Penal Code and Controlled Substances Act, we are finding common ground on the need to increase public safety by getting a better return on the dollars Kentucky invests in corrections.

The task force was created by the legislature earlier this year with the support of the Gov. Steve Beshear and Chief Justice John D. Minton Jr. — another noteworthy display of bipartisan cooperation by the three branches of government. Its work is being done in partnership with the respected, non-partisan Public Safety Performance Project of the Pew Center on the States. Pew is working in more than a dozen states (rising corrections costs being a nationwide problem) to analyze data to identify what is driving prison growth and work with state officials to develop research-based, fiscally sound policy options to protect public safety and strengthen offender accountability while containing costs.

Pew provides valuable research to help ensure that decisions are based on facts, not on anecdotal evidence.

For example, the data shows Kentucky has had one of the fastest-growing prison populations in the nation over the past decade. Even with a decline during the past three years, our inmate population is 45 percent larger than it was at the beginning of the decade — and that compares with 13 percent growth for the nation's state prison system as a whole.

Even though it would be logical to conclude that this increase has come about as a result of a higher crime rate, that is not the case. Our serious crime rate has been well below that of the nation and other southern states since the 1960s, and the current crime rate is about what it was in 1974.

As a result of this prison growth, state spending on corrections has more than tripled in the last 20 years If spending more money meant the public would be better protected from inmates who eventually leave prison — and, of course, the vast majority of them do — it would be more than worth the cost. But that isn't the reality of our situation. In fact, despite increased spending, the percentage of offenders who returned to prison within three years of release has increased over the past decade, from 37 percent in 1997 to 43 percent in 2006.

What is contributing to the growing number of inmates?

More people are being arrested, even as the crime rate has remained flat, with the increase being driven by a 70 percent spike in drug offense arrests. In addition, Kentucky uses prison — as opposed to alternative sentences like probation — at a much higher rate than most other states. And parolees who do not have a new felony conviction but who violate the conditions of their release are being returned to prison at a higher rate.

As the task force considers possible strategies to protect public safety and control corrections spending, the need for change is clear. We simply cannot afford to continue doing things the way we've always done them. If we fail to act now, projections show that Kentucky will have to spend at least $161 million more on corrections by 2020.

And so you find a prosecutor and defense attorney coming together — with legislators, state and local officials and the chief justice of the Kentucky Supreme Court — in an effort to chart a course that will make a positive difference. The task force plans to issue its recommendations to the state legislature in January and the focus will be clear: getting Kentuckians a better return on their public safety dollars through policy options that protect public safety and hold offenders accountable, while controlling corrections costs.

Tom Handy, who practices law in London, is a former commonwealth's attorney. Attorney Guthrie True of Frankfort is a former public defender.


Read more: http://www.kentucky.com/2010/12/23/1577269/kentucky-needs-to-control-rising.html#ixzz18wqv3IUQ

Labels: ,

Monday, July 13, 2009

Senator Lindsey Graham: A Republican Voice Of Reason And Common Sense. Watch Video.



More voice of reason below?:

Labels: , , , , ,

Sunday, January 11, 2009

George F. Will: Legal Outcomes Expose A Lack Of Common Sense.

Legal outcomes expose a lack of common sense
By George F. Will

WASHINGTON -- Called to a Florida school that could not cope, police led the disorderly student away in handcuffs, all 40 pounds of her 5-year-old self. In a Solomonic compromise, schools in Broward County, Fla., banned running at recess. Long Beach, N.J., removed signs warning swimmers about riptides, although the oblivious tides continued. The warning label on a five-inch fishing lure with a three-pronged hook says, "Harmful if swallowed"; the label on a letter opener says, "Safety goggle recommended."

No official at the Florida school would put a restraining arm around the misbehaving child lest he or she be sued, as a young member of Teach for America was, for $20 million (the school settled for $90,000), because the teacher put a hand on the back of a turbulent seventh-grader to direct him to leave the classroom. ... Someone hurt while running at recess might sue the school district for inadequate supervision of the runner, as Broward County knows: It settled 189 playground lawsuits in five years. In Indiana, a boy did what boys do: He went down a slide head first -- and broke his femur. The school district was sued for inadequate supervision. Because of fears of such liabilities, all over America playgrounds have been stripped of the equipment that made them fun. So now in front of televisions and computer terminals sit millions of obese children, casualties of what attorney and author Philip Howard calls "a bubble wrap approach to child rearing" produced by the "cult of safety." Long Beach removed the warning signs because it is safer to say nothing: Reckless swimmers injured by the tides might sue, claiming that the signs were not sufficiently large or shrill or numerous, or something. Only a public outcry got the signs restored.

Defensive, and ludicrous, warning labels multiply because aggressiveness proliferates. Lawsuits express the theory that anyone should be able to sue to assert that someone is culpable for even an idiotic action by the plaintiff, such as swallowing a fishing lure.

A predictable byproduct of this theory is brazen cynicism, encouraged by what Howard calls trial lawyers "congregating at the intersection of human tragedy and human greed." So:

A volunteer for a Catholic charity in Milwaukee ran a red light and seriously injured another person. Because the volunteer did not have deep pockets, the injured person sued the archdiocese -- successfully, for $17 million.

The thread connecting such lunacies is a fear permeating American life. It is, alas, a sensible fear arising from America's increasingly perverse legal culture that is the subject of what surely will be 2009's most needed book on public affairs -- Howard's Life Without Lawyers: Liberating Americans from Too Much Law.

A nation in which the proportion of lawyers in the work force almost doubled between 1970 and 2000 has become ludicrously dense with laws. Now legal self-consciousness is stifling the exercise of judgment. Today's entitlement culture inculcates the idea that everyone is entitled to a life without danger, disappointment or aggravation. Any disagreement or annoyance can be aggressively "framed in the language of legal deprivation."

Law is essential to, but can stifle, freedom. Today, Howard writes, "Americans increasingly go through the day looking over their shoulders instead of where they want to go." The land of the free and the home of the brave has become "a legal minefield" through which we timidly tiptoe lest we trigger a legal claim. What should be routine daily choices and interactions are fraught with legal risk.

Time was, rights were defensive. They were to prevent government from doing things to you. Today, rights increasingly are offensive weapons wielded to inflict demands on other people, using state power for private aggrandizement. The multiplication of rights, each lacking limiting principles, multiplies nonnegotiable conflicts conducted with the inherent extremism of rights rhetoric, on the assumption, Howard says, "that society will somehow achieve equilibrium if it placates whomever is complaining."

But in such a society, dazed by what Howard calls "rule stupor" and victimized by litigious "victims," the incentives are for intensified complaining. Read Howard's book, and weep for the death of common sense.

George F. Will is a syndicated columnist with The Washington Post. His e-mail address is georgewill@washpost.com.

Labels: ,

Wednesday, December 26, 2007

Felons should NOT have their rights to vote denied them, UNLESS they have been convicted of election related crimes. Enough said, and enough already.

Yep, enough said and enough of this nonsense already.

Read the pre-filed bill.

Labels: , , , , , , ,

Wednesday, November 21, 2007

**** "We will NEVER survive unless WE put a lid on CRAZY"! ****

Here's why.

Otherwise, we will pay a HORRIBLE price once these folks are released from prison, and they come back into society where they can practice their NEWLY acquired CRIMINAL skills from prison on us.

This is common sense, by the way. One, like myself, can be VERY STRONG on law enforcement and STILL be able to recognize that we do NOT need to incarcerate EVERYONE to solve our crime problems.

Alternatives to incarceration need to be explored and implemented QUICKLY in order, as my fellow Country man and world renowned Singer SEAL will sing while WARNING that, "WE WILL NEVER SURVIVE UNLESS WE PUT A LID ON CRAZY".

Labels: , , ,

Saturday, November 17, 2007

Kentucky "blows" another one, loses chance at 1300 new jobs.

Read it here.

You go figure.

Labels:

Sunday, November 11, 2007

State senate is where "fight" for gaming will be, it looks like Beshear will win that "fight". Let's help him make sure that is the result.

Meaning NO disrespect to anyone, I predict the state house of Representatives will be behind (and back) Beshear's idea to put a constitutional amendment on the ballot so that voters can decide if Kentucky should allow gaming. I also predict the state senate is where the REAL "fight" for gaming will shape up, but according to a study done by the Courier-Journal, it looks like Beshear will win that "fight", as Beshear ONLY needs 23 votes.

LET'S HELP HIM MAKE SURE THAT WILL BE THE RESULT.

Here is a list of the state Senators, who are for allowing the issue on the ballot, neutral at this point, or outright against it:

SENATE ON CASINO GAMBLING

Where members of the Senate stand on a proposed constitutional amendment that would let voters decide on legalizing casino gambling. Twenty-three of the Senate's 38 members -- three-fifths -- must vote yes for an amendment to pass.

FOR or LEANING FOR: 15

Walter Blevins, D-West Liberty: "It's not like gambling is something foreign to Kentucky."

David Boswell, D-Owensboro: "Chances are much better today."

Julian Carroll, D-Frankfort: "I plan to vote for putting the issue on the ballot."

Perry Clark, D-Louisville: "No matter how it's written, probably … I'm going to vote to place the ballot initiative before the people."

Carroll Gibson, R-Leitchfield: "I think the people should make a decision one way or the other."

Denise Harper Angel, D-Louisville: "I definitely will support that issue."

Ray Jones, D-Pikeville: "I certainly don't see a problem with allowing all the people of Kentucky to decide the issue."

Gerald Neal, D-Louisville: "I think it's unacceptable to continue to let money drain out of Kentucky, particularly our border cities like Louisville."

R.J. Palmer, D-Winchester: "Voters of Kentucky have made it very clear they want a chance to vote on this issue."

Joey Pendleton, D-Hopkinsville: "Let's put it on the ballot and give everybody a shot at voting for it or against it."

Dorsey Ridley, D-Henderson: "I was looking for quality leadership in Kentucky. I found it in Steve Beshear."

Ernesto Scorsone, D-Lexington: "I think overwhelmingly people are saying, 'Put it on the ballot.' "

Dan Seum, R-Louisville: "If a reasonable amendment comes to the Senate, I'll vote to put it on the ballot."

Tim Shaughnessy, D-Louisville: "I'm going to be very supportive of what the administration wants to accomplish."

Ed Worley, D-Richmond: "There's no denying the people want to vote on this issue."

AGAINST OR LEANING AGAINST: 13

Charlie Borders, R-Russell: "I'm willing to look at the language, but at this point I would be a firm no."

Julie Denton, R-Louisville: "I have concerns that if we were to have expanded gambling in the state what the impact would be."

Brett Guthrie, R-Bowling Green: "I'm not for approving the expansion of gambling in Kentucky."

Ernie Harris, R-Crestwood: "I'd have to see the bill for sure, but I do not intend on voting for the bill."

Tom Jensen, R-London: "I'm leaning toward voting no, but I will listen to my constituents."

Dan Kelly, R-Springfield: "I wouldn't expect to be for it."

Alice Forgy Kerr, R-Lexington: "It will happen over my dead body."

Bob Leeper, I-Paducah: "I don't think expanded gambling is positive for Kentucky."

Vernie McGaha, R-Russell Springs: "I would be adamantly against it."

Gary Tapp, R-Waddy: "I am against it"

Jack Westwood, R-Crescent Springs: "I don't support it and I would not vote for it."

David Williams, R-Burkesville: "I'm not going to vote for a bill that will put the casino gaming issue on the ballot."

Ken Winters, R-Murray: "I'm pretty solidly against it."

UNDECIDED: 8

Tom Buford, R-Nicholasville: "I'm not saying no, but I'm not a poster child for it."

Jerry Rhoads, D-Madisonville: "I want to see what the governor submits to us."

Dick Roeding, R-Lakeside Park: "I never speculate on my votes until I see the bill."

Katie Stine, R-Southgate: "I think we really need to see what the House does with it before we talk about what we will or won't do."

Robert Stivers, R-Manchester: "I would try to sit back and listen to the discussions and be objective."

Damon Thayer, R-Georgetown: "The onus for the gambling issue falls squarely on the shoulders of Steve Beshear and Speaker of the House Jody Richards."

Elizabeth Tori, R-Radcliff: "I'm just at this point neutral."

Johnny Ray Turner, D-Drift: "I'll have to look at where the money is going to go."

COULDN'T BE REACHED: 1

Richie Sanders, R-Franklin

Note: Sen. Dan Mongiardo, D-Hazard, will resign from the Senate shortly before he is inaugurated as lieutenant governor on Dec. 11. An election will be held early during the legislative session to fill his vacant seat.


If your Senator is NOT on the list in support of putting gaming on the ballot for the voters to decide it, call him or her to support it.

Those who do NOT support putting the issue on the ballot for us to vote on, act like that they are our BIG brothers, who know what's BEST for us because they see us as being INCAPABLE of making an INTELLIGENT decision regarding what is GOOD (or bad) for us.

In case if you have ANY more questions on this issue, please bear in mind that THIS IS THE WAY TOTALITARIAN REGIMES, LIKE COMMUNIST CHINA, NORTH KOREA, and others like IRAQ, SADDAM HUSSEIN'S IRAQ and other OPPRESSIVE REGIMES ACT TOWARDS THEIR PEOPLE.

SO GET ON THE PHONE, WRITE OR EMAIL AND LET YOUR SENATOR KNOW THAT YOU WANT TO CAST YOUR VOTE for or against GAMING. TELL THEM YOU ARE SMART ENOUGH TO DECIDE THIS ISSUE YOURSELF!

Labels: , , , , , ,

Friday, November 09, 2007

SAD to say, but Rudy Giuliani's mistakes will turn out to be ours, if we nominate him.


Rudy Giuliani's mistakes may turn out to be ours, if we nominate him. His latest mistake concerns his buddy buddy, Bernard Kerik, who has just being indicted.

This is just one of many FAUX PAS that makes Rudy notorious we won't even begin to go into details about how he CONSISTENTLY profits from the tragedy of 9/11. Heck his campaign is all about -- yes, you guessed it -- 9/11).

For Republicans to nominate Rudy Giuliani for President -- and for him to ACTUALLY win -- will be a DISASTER IN THE MAKING for ALL of us.

You think and say Hillary Clinton is BAD? Well, don't miss Rudy, either!!

NOTE: Incidenttly, both Rudy Giuliani and Hillary Clinton want to give ILLEGAL immigrants drivers licenses! You go figure. Maybe, the two of them can run on the same PRO illegal immigration, pro abortion, pro gay rights, pro marital infidelity ticket.

Labels: , , , , ,

Tuesday, October 16, 2007

Please support Mitch McConnell's plan to make the internet/web a tax free zone.


Keep the Web Tax-Free


Show your support of the efforts of Senator McConnell and others to pass S.156, the Permanent Internet Tax Freedom Act of 2007, by signing the above petition.

Congress should encourage expanded Internet access, broadband deployment and the development of new technologies that will create jobs and economic growth. New taxes will stifle those goals. Therefore, you should join this national movement to permanently block such a tax.

Labels: , ,

Tuesday, October 02, 2007

Obama promises to seek a world "with no nuclear weapons", ...

... (Read it here), but how else are we supposed to kill ourselves and annihilate the human race?

Bad, Obama, bad. (My tongue is in my cheek!)

Editor's Note: This deserves a new post label: Common sense (though it REALLY should be Uncommon sense, since sense is NO longer Common!!)

Labels: